Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May;92(3):167-179.
doi: 10.13110/humanbiology.92.3.04.

Isolation by Distance and the Problem of the Twenty-First Century

Affiliations
Review

Isolation by Distance and the Problem of the Twenty-First Century

Shay-Akil McLean. Hum Biol. 2021 May.

Abstract

Isolation-by-distance models are part of the institutional creed of antiracialism used to critique claims of biological race concepts (BRCs). Proponents of antiracialism appeal to isolation-by-distance models to describe patterns of human genetic differences among and between groups as a function of distance. Isolation by distance has been referred to as the pattern that human genetic variation fits, distributing the differences we see as race throughout geographic space as a series of Gaussian gradients. Contemporary scientific critiques of BRCs fuse social constructionist race concepts with a description of the distribution of proportions of human genetic variation in geographic space as a function of distance. These two points are often followed by statements noting that there is only one human race. How these two concepts connect to each other, and whether or not they connect at all, is unclear in both academic and nonacademic spaces. Consequently, scientists and the public lack an understanding of human population structure and its relationships to varying systems of human interactions. This article reviews isolation-by-distance models in population genetics and the use of these models in the modern problem of human difference. The article presents a historical and conceptual review of isolation-by-distance models and contemporary scientific critiques of BRCs, followed by examples of the use of isolation-by-distance models in studies of human genetic variation. To address the shortcomings in the scientific critique of race, the author proposes combining Du Boisian demography with Darwinian evolutionary biology. From a Du Boisian demographic perspective, race is a product of racism, or race/ism, and is a heredity and inheritance system based on rules of partus sequitur ventrem and hypodescent. Race marks individuals and groups them to reproduce unequal relationships into which Europeans co-opted them. This synthesis propounds a new racial formation theory to understand the more general consequences of racism on genes and health outcomes.

Keywords: ISOLATION BY DISTANCE; RACE; RACISM; W. E. B. DU BOIS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baharain, S., M. Barakatt, C. R. Gignoux et al. 2016. The Great Migration and African-American genomic diversity. <italic>PLoS Genet</italic>. 12:1–27.
    1. Barbujani, G. 1987. Autocorrelation of gene frequencies under isolation by distance. <italic>Genetics</italic> 117:777–782.
    1. Bliss, C. 2012. <italic>Race Decoded: The Genomic Fight for Social Justice</italic>. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    1. Byrd, W. C., and L. E. Best. 2016. Between (racial) groups and a hard place: An exploration of social science approaches to race and genetics, 2000–2014. <italic>Biodemography Soc. Biol</italic>. 62:281–299.
    1. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. 2005. The Human Genome Diversity Project: Past, present and future. <italic>Nat. Rev. Genet.</italic> 6: 333–340.

LinkOut - more resources