The Effect of Luteinising Hormone Suppression in In Vitro Fertilisation Antagonist Cycles
- PMID: 34076868
- DOI: 10.1007/s43032-021-00608-0
The Effect of Luteinising Hormone Suppression in In Vitro Fertilisation Antagonist Cycles
Abstract
Use of GnRH antagonists in IVF stimulation protocols shortens controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) and reduces the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). However, profound reduction in LH levels has been associated with use of GnRH antagonists. This study aims to determine if LH suppression during GnRH antagonist cycles results in poorer IVF outcomes. This was a prospective pilot longitudinal study where serum LH levels were measured on day 2/3 of the menstrual cycle before COH, 1/2 days following institution of GnRH antagonist and at the day of ovulation trigger. A threshold of LH <0.5 IU/L was used to define profound LH suppression. Data on IVF outcomes was collected. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate risk factors associated with LH suppression following GnRH antagonist IVF treatment. Ninety-one eligible women were recruited. Women underwent a standard antagonist cycle with Puregon 200u and Ganirelix. No participant had LH <0.5 IU/L prior to GnRH antagonist treatment, and 27 participants (29.7%) had significant LH suppression at either time point. Predictors of profound LH suppression following GnRH antagonist treatment identified (P < 0.20) were age (OR = 0.80, P = 0.013), no previous ovulation induction (OR = 0.26, P = 0.033) and previous GnRH antagonist IVF cycle (OR = 4.32, P = 0.125). Numbers of oocytes, embryos and ongoing pregnancy rates at 12 weeks gestation in patients with and without LH suppression did not differ significantly. We found associations between clinical characteristics and risk of profound LH suppression in women undergoing GnRH antagonist IVF cycles, but no significant differences in IVF and pregnancy outcomes between women with and without significant LH suppression.
Keywords: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist treatment; In vitro fertilisation; Infertility; Luteinising hormone.
© 2021. Society for Reproductive Investigation.
Similar articles
-
Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alone during GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation in patients aged ≥35 years: a randomized controlled trial.Hum Reprod. 2015 May;30(5):1188-95. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev038. Epub 2015 Mar 3. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 25740882 Clinical Trial.
-
Profound LH suppression after GnRH antagonist administration is associated with a significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rate in IVF.Hum Reprod. 2004 Nov;19(11):2490-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh471. Epub 2004 Aug 19. Hum Reprod. 2004. PMID: 15319383 Clinical Trial.
-
Dynamics of the development of multiple follicles during ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization using recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (Puregon) and various doses of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix (Orgalutran/Antagon).Fertil Steril. 2001 Apr;75(4):688-93. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01789-1. Fertil Steril. 2001. PMID: 11287020 Clinical Trial.
-
Recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) and recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) for ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI cycles.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 24;5(5):CD005070. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005070.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28537052 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive technology.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 29;4(4):CD001750. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001750.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27126581 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Effectiveness of letrozole in pituitary downregulated normogonadotrophic young women with an initial poor response.Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Apr 14;102(15):e33510. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033510. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023. PMID: 37058071 Free PMC article.
-
Luteinizing hormone supplementation in women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism seeking fertility care: Insights from a narrative review.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 1;13:907249. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.907249. eCollection 2022. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35979440 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Al-Inany HG, Youssef MA, Ayeleke RO, Brown J, Lam WS, Broekmans FJ. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2016;(4). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001750.pub4
-
- Hg A, Mafm Y, Aboulghar M, Fj B, Jg S. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive technology (Review) Summary of Findings for the Main Comparison. 2016;(5).
-
- M.A Y and FV der V and HGA-I and GG and MHM and IA and SMK and M van W, M.A. Y, F. V der V, H.G. A-I, G. G, M.H. M, et al. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist assisted reproductive technology cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2011;1(10):CD008046. Available from: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD008046.pub4/...
-
- Esposito MA, Barnhart KT, Coutifaris C, Patrizio P. Role of periovulatory luteinizing hormone concentrations during assisted reproductive technology cycles stimulated exclusively with recombinant follicle- stimulating hormone. Fertil Steril. 2001;75(3):519–24. - DOI
-
- Merviel P, Antoine JM, Mathieu E, Millot F, Mandelbaum J, Uzan S. Luteinizing hormone concentrations after gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist administration do not influence pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(1):119–25. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
