Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Aug;107(4):1003-1015.
doi: 10.1111/tpj.15363. Epub 2021 Jul 5.

Genome downsizing after polyploidy: mechanisms, rates and selection pressures

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Genome downsizing after polyploidy: mechanisms, rates and selection pressures

Xiaotong Wang et al. Plant J. 2021 Aug.
Free article

Abstract

An analysis of over 10 000 plant genome sizes (GSs) indicates that most species have smaller genomes than expected given the incidence of polyploidy in their ancestries, suggesting selection for genome downsizing. However, comparing ancestral GS with the incidence of ancestral polyploidy suggests that the rate of DNA loss following polyploidy is likely to have been very low (4-70 Mb/million years, 4-482 bp/generation). This poses a problem. How might such small DNA losses be visible to selection, overcome the power of genetic drift and drive genome downsizing? Here we explore that problem, focussing on the role that double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways (non-homologous end joining and homologous recombination) may have played. We also explore two hypotheses that could explain how selection might favour genome downsizing following polyploidy: to reduce (i) nitrogen (N) and phosphate (P) costs associated with nucleic acid synthesis in the nucleus and the transcriptome and (ii) the impact of scaling effects of GS on cell size, which influences CO2 uptake and water loss. We explore the hypothesis that losses of DNA must be fastest in early polyploid generations. Alternatively, if DNA loss is a more continuous process over evolutionary time, then we propose it is a byproduct of selection elsewhere, such as limiting the damaging activity of repetitive DNA. If so, then the impact of GS on photosynthesis, water use efficiency and/or nutrient costs at the nucleus level may be emergent properties, which have advantages, but not ones that could have been selected for over generational timescales.

Keywords: DNA loss rate; DNA repair; genome downsizing; selection pressures; whole-genome duplications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acquisti, C., Elser, J.J. & Kumar, S. (2009a) Ecological nitrogen limitation shapes the DNA composition of plant genomes. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 26, 953-956.
    1. Acquisti, C., Kumar, S. & Elser, J.J. (2009b) Signatures of nitrogen limitation in the elemental composition of the proteins involved in the metabolic apparatus. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276, 2605-2610.
    1. Anneberg, T.J. & Segraves, K.A. (2020) Nutrient enrichment and neopolyploidy interact to increase lifetime fitness of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant and Soil, 1-15.
    1. Assis, R. & Kondrashov, A.S. (2012) A strong deletion bias in nonallelic gene conversion. PLoS Genetics, 8, e1002508.
    1. Bales, A.L. & Hersch-Green, E.I. (2019) Effects of soil nitrogen on diploid advantage in fireweed, Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae). Ecology and Evolution, 9, 1095-1109.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources