Reliability and reproducibility of sciatic nerve magnetization transfer imaging and T2 relaxometry
- PMID: 34104997
- PMCID: PMC8589742
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08072-9
Reliability and reproducibility of sciatic nerve magnetization transfer imaging and T2 relaxometry
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the interreader and test-retest reliability of magnetization transfer imaging (MTI) and T2 relaxometry in sciatic nerve MR neurography (MRN).
Materials and methods: In this prospective study, 21 healthy volunteers were examined three times on separate days by a standardized MRN protocol at 3 Tesla, consisting of an MTI sequence, a multi-echo T2 relaxometry sequence, and a high-resolution T2-weighted sequence. Magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), T2 relaxation time, and proton spin density (PSD) of the sciatic nerve were assessed by two independent observers, and both interreader and test-retest reliability for all readout parameters were reported by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standard error of measurement (SEM).
Results: For the sciatic nerve, overall mean ± standard deviation MTR was 26.75 ± 3.5%, T2 was 64.54 ± 8.2 ms, and PSD was 340.93 ± 78.8. ICCs ranged between 0.81 (MTR) and 0.94 (PSD) for interreader reliability and between 0.75 (MTR) and 0.94 (PSD) for test-retest reliability. SEM for interreader reliability was 1.7% for MTR, 2.67 ms for T2, and 21.3 for PSD. SEM for test-retest reliability was 1.7% for MTR, 2.66 ms for T2, and 20.1 for PSD.
Conclusions: MTI and T2 relaxometry of the sciatic nerve are reliable and reproducible. The values of measurement imprecision reported here may serve as a guide for correct interpretation of quantitative MRN biomarkers in future studies.
Key points: • Magnetization transfer imaging (MTI) and T2 relaxometry of the sciatic nerve are reliable and reproducible. • The imprecision that is unavoidably associated with different scans or different readers can be estimated by the here presented SEM values for the biomarkers T2, PSD, and MTR. • These values may serve as a guide for correct interpretation of quantitative MRN biomarkers in future studies and possible clinical applications.
Keywords: Biomarkers; Magnetic resonance imaging; Observer variation; Peripheral nervous system; Reproducibility of results.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Peripheral Nerve Diffusion Tensor Imaging : Interreader and Test-retest Reliability as Quantified by the Standard Error of Measurement.Clin Neuroradiol. 2020 Dec;30(4):679-689. doi: 10.1007/s00062-019-00859-0. Epub 2019 Dec 5. Clin Neuroradiol. 2020. PMID: 31807812
-
Magnetic Resonance Neurography : Normal Values and Demographic Determinants of Nerve Caliber and T2 Relaxometry in 60 healthy individuals.Clin Neuroradiol. 2019 Mar;29(1):19-26. doi: 10.1007/s00062-017-0633-5. Epub 2017 Oct 13. Clin Neuroradiol. 2019. PMID: 29030674
-
Quantitative MR-Neurography at 3.0T: Inter-Scanner Reproducibility.Front Neurosci. 2022 Feb 16;16:817316. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.817316. eCollection 2022. Front Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35250457 Free PMC article.
-
Simultaneous Multislice Accelerated TSE for Improved Spatiotemporal Resolution and Diagnostic Accuracy in Magnetic Resonance Neurography: A Feasibility Study.Invest Radiol. 2023 May 1;58(5):363-371. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000940. Epub 2022 Dec 9. Invest Radiol. 2023. PMID: 36729753
-
Magnetization transfer ratio of the sciatic nerve differs between patients in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.Eur Radiol Exp. 2024 Jan 9;8(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s41747-023-00405-1. Eur Radiol Exp. 2024. PMID: 38191821 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Quantitative double echo steady state T2 mapping of upper extremity peripheral nerves and muscles.Front Neurol. 2024 Feb 15;15:1359033. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1359033. eCollection 2024. Front Neurol. 2024. PMID: 38426170 Free PMC article.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound elastography in the context of preclinical pharmacological research: significance for the 3R principles.Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jun 28;14:1177421. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1177421. eCollection 2023. Front Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 37448960 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quantitative MR Neurography in Multifocal Motor Neuropathy and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 25;13(7):1237. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13071237. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37046455 Free PMC article.
-
Candidate imaging biomarkers for PMP22-related inherited neuropathies.Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2022 Jul;9(7):925-935. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51561. Epub 2022 Jun 3. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2022. PMID: 35656877 Free PMC article.
-
Spatial Distribution and Long-Term Alterations of Peripheral Nerve Lesions in Schwannomatosis.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 23;12(4):780. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040780. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35453828 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chhabra A, Madhuranthakam AJ, Andreisek G. Magnetic resonance neurography: current perspectives and literature review. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:698–707. - PubMed
-
- Kronlage M, Knop KC, Schwarz D, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis versus multifocal motor neuropathy: utility of MR neurography. Radiology. 2019;292:149–156. - PubMed
-
- Hilgenfeld T, Jende J, Schwarz D, et al. Somatotopic fascicular lesions of the brachial plexus demonstrated by high-resolution magnetic resonance neurography. Invest Radiol. 2017;52:741–746. - PubMed
-
- Vaeggemose M, Pham M, Ringgaard S, et al. Magnetic resonance neurography visualizes abnormalities in sciatic and tibial nerves in patients with type 1 diabetes and neuropathy. Diabetes. 2017;66:1779–1788. - PubMed
-
- Preisner F, Bendszus M, Schwarz D. Visualization of direct median nerve damage following transbrachial arterial access. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:1265–1266. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
