Estimating the stock size of harbor seals (Phoca vitulina richardii) in the inland waters of Washington State using line-transect methods

PLoS One. 2021 Jun 9;16(6):e0241254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241254. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Harbor seals (Phoca vitulina richardii) in the inland waters of Washington were reduced by predator control programs in the twentieth century, but stocks have rebounded since being protected in the 1970s. Three management stocks are recognized, but there is little information on their current abundance. We conducted 38,431 km of aerial line-transect surveys throughout the range of these stocks in 2013-2016, sighting a total of 4,678 groups of harbor seals. Line-transect analysis with Beaufort sea state as a covariate provided estimates of the number of seals in the water. We then incorporated tagging data from 15 instrumented seals to develop correction factors, both for seals missed in the water while diving, and those that were on shore. Tagging data were modeled with generalized linear mixed models to provide estimates of the proportions diving and hauled out. After applying these correction factors, we estimated that the Hood Canal stock contained 1,368 seals (CV = 16.8%), the Southern Puget Sound stock contained 1,976 seals (CV = 20.5%), and the Washington Northern Inland Waters stock contained 7,513 seals (CV = 11.5%). This study presents a non-traditional approach to estimating the size of Washington inland waters harbor seal stocks, which may also be applicable to other species for which survey and tagging data are available.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Female
  • Male
  • Models, Statistical
  • Phoca*
  • Population Density
  • Seasons
  • Washington

Grants and funding

Funding for the aerial surveys was provided by the US Navy and US National Marine Mammal Laboratory (NMML)/NMFS. Additional analysis funds were provided by the Puget Sound Partnership and Long Live the Kings. We are grateful also to HDR, Inc. and especially to K. Ampela for assistance in funding surveys. The funders provided support in the form of salaries for authors [TAJ, MAS], but did not have any additional role in the data collection and analysis, or preparation of the manuscript. They only had a very minor role in study design suggestions, and decision to publish. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.