Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 9;7(24):eabi5781.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abi5781. Print 2021 Jun.

Combined tumor-directed recruitment and protection from immune suppression enable CAR T cell efficacy in solid tumors

Affiliations

Combined tumor-directed recruitment and protection from immune suppression enable CAR T cell efficacy in solid tumors

Bruno L Cadilha et al. Sci Adv. .

Abstract

CAR T cell therapy remains ineffective in solid tumors, due largely to poor infiltration and T cell suppression at the tumor site. T regulatory (Treg) cells suppress the immune response via inhibitory factors such as transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β). Treg cells expressing the C-C chemokine receptor 8 (CCR8) have been associated with poor prognosis in solid tumors. We postulated that CCR8 could be exploited to redirect effector T cells to the tumor site while a dominant-negative TGF-β receptor 2 (DNR) can simultaneously shield them from TGF-β. We identified that CCL1 from activated T cells potentiates a feedback loop for CCR8+ T cell recruitment to the tumor site. This sustained and improved infiltration of engineered T cells synergized with TGF-β shielding for improved therapeutic efficacy. Our results demonstrate that addition of CCR8 and DNR into CAR T cells can render them effective in solid tumors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. CCR8 is used by a subset of transferred antigen-specific T cells to traffic to a murine pancreatic cancer in a CCL1-dependent manner.
(A) Schematic experimental layout to determine the gene expression profile of OT-I T cells after adoptive transfer. (B) Volcano plot for gene expression profile of tumor-infiltrating OT-I T cell compared to a splenocyte benchmark. Gene expression is depicted on the x axis versus the P value depicted on the y axis. (n = 3 mice). (C) RT-PCR gene analysis of explanted Panc02-OVA tumors (n = 4). HPRT, hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase. (D) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for murine CCL1 on organ lysates of control animals (n = 3) or Panc02-OVA tumor-bearing animals (n = 10). LNIL, lymph node ipsilateral to the tumor; LNCL, lymph node contralateral to the tumor. (E) Fourteen-day Panc02-OVA tumor explants, embedded in OCT medium and frozen for cryosectioning and stained with CCL1 and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (representative of n = 3 mice). (F) ELISA for murine CCL1 on CD4+ or CD8+ magnetic-activated cell-sorted T cells after 24-hour stimulation with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies or vehicle solutions only (representative of n = 3 independent experiments). (G) ELISA for murine CCL1 of supernatants generated upon 24- or 48-hour culture of different effector to target ratios, namely, 0, 1, 5, or 10 OT-I T cells to 1 tumor target cell (a constant number of 20.000 Panc02-OVA tumor cells was used) (representative of n = 3 independent experiments). nd stands for nondetectable. ns stands for nonsignificant P > 0.05. Experiments show mean values ± SEM of at least triplicates and are representative of at least three independent experiments. P values are based on two-sided unpaired t test. Data shown in (D) are pooled from three independent experiments.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. CCR8 transduction in OT-I T cells improves ACT efficacy through CCL1-dependent tumor trafficking.
(A) CCR8 staining of live, CD45+CD3+CD4+FoxP3+ CD44high CD62L eTreg and CD44low CD62L+ cTreg Panc02-OVA–infiltrating cells. CCR8 expression on CD4+, CD8+, eTreg, and cTreg T cells. (n = 3 mice). APC, Allophycocyanin. (B) CCR8-GFP transduction efficiency of murine T cells. FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate. (C) In vitro migration of murine T cells to CCL1. (D) Experimental layout for (E) to (H). (E) Tumor growth curves of mice treated with a single intravenous (i.v.) injection of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or 107 GFP-transduced or CCR8-transduced OT-I T cells (n = 5 mice per group). (F) Tumor survival curves of (E). (G) Panc02-OVA-CCL1 tumor growth curves of mice treated with a single intravenous injection of PBS or 107 GFP-transduced or CCR8-transduced OT-I T cells (n = 5 mice per group). (H) Tumor survival curves of (G). (I) ACT tracking experiments in Panc02 or Panc02-CCL1 tumors by flow cytometry. s.c., subcutaneous. (J) Live, CD45.1+ tumor-infiltrating T cells (n = 3 mice). (K and L) ACT tracking in mice with tumors in a dorsal skinfold chamber to enable multiphoton intravital imaging (L) and speed quantification of tumor-infiltrating T cells (M) (n = 8 mice). FOV, field of view. Experiments show mean values ± SEM and are representative of three independent experiments, except (G) and (H) that are representative of two independent experiments. P values for (C), (J), (L), and (M) are based on a two-sided unpaired t test. Analyses of differences between groups for (E) and (G) were performed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with correction for multiple testing by the Bonferroni method. Comparison of survival rates for (F) and (H) was performed with the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. DNR-transduced T cells retain proliferative capacity despite TGF-β.
(A) CD45+CD3+CD4+FoxP3+ CD44high CD62L eTreg and CD44low CD62L+ cTreg Panc02-OVA infiltrating cells (n = 5 mice). PE, Phycoerythrin. (B) Percentage of Treg/CD4+ in (A) (n = 5 mice). Treg cells: lymph nodes 15406 ± 5351, spleen 6992 ± 9702, and tumor 893 ± 244 (mean absolute cells ± SD). (C) Percentage eTreg cells in Treg cells. (D) Percentage TGF-β+ cells in eTreg (n = 10). (E) Murine TGF-β ELISA on 20.000 tumor cells supernatant (n = 3). (F) DNR downstream signaling. AA, amino acid. (G) Transduction efficiency of murine T cells with DNR. (H) T cell proliferation measured through flow cytometry (n = 3). (I) Experimental layout for tumor challenge with Panc02-OVA. (J) Tumor growth curve in mice treated with a single intravenous injection of PBS or 107 GFP-transduced or DNR-transduced OT-I T cells (n = 5). (K) Tumor survival curves of (J). (L) Flow cytometry ACT tracking in Panc02 tumor–bearing mice treated with an equal mix of DNR-mCherry T cells and GFP T cells (n = 3). Experiments show mean values ± SEM and are representative of three independent experiments, except (A) to (C), which was performed for a total of 5 mice, and (D) a total of 10 mice. P values for (B), (C), (D), (E), and (L) are based on two-sided unpaired t test. Analyses of differences between groups for (J) were performed using two-way ANOVA with correction for multiple testing by the Bonferroni method. Comparison of survival rates for (K) was performed with the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. CCR8-DNR–transduced CAR T cells mediate superior in vivo efficacy in pancreatic solid tumors.
(A) Schematic representation of murine retroviral construct for T cell engineering. 5’ LTR, long terminal repeat; Amp R, Ampicilin resistance. (B) Transduction efficiency of primary murine T cells with CCR8-DNR-CAR. (C) Boyden chamber assay to assess in vitro migration of primary murine T cells to recombinant murine CCL1 measured by flow cytometry. Migrated cells were normalized for CCR8 expression. n = 3. (D) T cell fold expansion over 48 hours with or without TGF-β on the culture media, measured through flow cytometry (representative of n = 3 independent experiments). (E) ELISA for murine IFN-γ was performed on supernatants generated after 24-hour culture of T cells with Panc02-EpCAM tumor cells, in a ratio of 10 effector cells to 1 target cell (representative of n = 3 independent experiments). (F) Panc02-EpCAM tumor cell killing by different T cell conditions, in a 10-fold concentration, measured over time through xCELLigence. Representative of n = 3 independent experiments. (G) Experimental layout for the ACT experiments depicted in (H) and (I). (H) Growth curves of Panc02-OVA-EpCAM tumors in C57Bl/6 mice that were treated with a single intravenous injection of PBS (n = 5 mice) or 107 CAR-transduced, DNR-CAR–transduced, CCR8-CAR–transduced (n = 8 mice) or CCR8-DNR-CAR–transduced T cells (n = 7 mice). (I) Tumor survival curves of a tumor challenge experiment with Panc02-OVA-EpCAM tumors. Mice were treated with a single intravenous injection of PBS (n = 5 mice) or 107 CAR-transduced, DNR-CAR–transduced, CCR8-CAR–transduced (n = 7 mice), or CCR8-DNR-CAR–transduced T cells (n = 8 mice). Experiments show mean values ± SEM and are representative of three independent experiments. P values for (C) to (E) are based on two-sided unpaired t test. Analyses of differences between groups for (F) and (H) were performed using two-way ANOVA with correction for multiple testing by the Bonferroni method. Comparison of survival rates for (I) was performed with the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. CCR8-DNR-CAR T cells are effective in human tumor models.
(A) Schematic representation of construct. (B) Transduction efficiency of human T cells with CCR8-DNR-CAR. (C) Human IFN-γ ELISA on 24-hour coculture supernatants. (D) SUIT-2-MSLN killing measured by xCELLigence. (E) Human CCL1 ELISA on 24-hour coculture supernatants. (C to E) 10:1 effector to target cells. (F) Forty-eight–hour T cell expansion, flow cytometry. (G) In vitro migration of T cells to CCL1, flow cytometry. (H) Experimental layout for (I) to (M). Tumor growth and survival curves of SUIT-2-MSLN (I and J), MIA PaCa-2-MSLN (K and L), and SUIT-2-MSLN-CCL1 (M) treated with a single intravenous injection of PBS or 107 CAR-, DNR-CAR–, CCR8-CAR–, or CCR8-DNR-CAR–transduced T cells (n = 5 mice per group). (N) Flow cytometry quantification of CAR T cells per bead per milligram on day 27 after tumor implantation (n = 5 mice). (O) Experimental layout for (P). (P) SUIT-2-MSLN tumor–bearing mice were administered with 107 CAR T cells that were either wild-type (wt) or CCL1 knockout (ko). This was followed by a treatment with 107 CCR8-transduced T cells (n = 7 mice). Experiments show mean values ± SEM of n = 7 healthy donors for (B) to (G), one experiment for (I) to (L) and (P), and two independent experiments for (M) and (N). P values for (C), (E), (F), (G), (N), and (P) are based on a two-sided unpaired t test. (D), (I), (K), and (M) were assessed through two-way ANOVA with correction for multiple testing by the Bonferroni method. (J and L) Survival rate comparison through the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kalos M., Levine B. L., Porter D. L., Katz S., Grupp S. A., Bagg A., June C. H., T cells with chimeric antigen receptors have potent antitumor effects and can establish memory in patients with advanced leukemia. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 95ra73 (2011). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Topalian S. L., Hodi F. S., Brahmer J. R., Gettinger S. N., Smith D. C., McDermott D. F., Powderly J. D., Carvajal R. D., Sosman J. A., Atkins M. B., Leming P. D., Spigel D. R., Antonia S. J., Horn L., Drake C. G., Pardoll D. M., Chen L., Sharfman W. H., Anders R. A., Taube J. M., McMiller T. L., Xu H., Korman A. J., Jure-Kunkel M., Agrawal S., McDonald D., Kollia G. D., Gupta A., Wigginton J. M., Sznol M., Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 2443–2454 (2012). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roseberg S. A., Restifo N. P., Adoptive cell transfer as personalized immunotherapy for human cancer. Science 348, 62–68 (2015). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benmebarek M.-R., Karches H. C., Cadilha L. B., Lesch S., Endres S., Kobold S., Killing mechanisms of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 1283 (2019). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Park J. H., Rivière I., Gonen M., Wang X., Sénéchal B., Curran K. J., Sauter C., Wang Y., Santomasso B., Mead E., Roshal M., Maslak P., Davila M., Brentjens R. J., Sadelain M., Long-term follow-up of CD19 CAR therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 449–459 (2018). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances