Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 1;139(8):839-846.
doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.1812.

Estimated Utility of the Short-term Assessment of Glaucoma Progression Model in Clinical Practice

Affiliations

Estimated Utility of the Short-term Assessment of Glaucoma Progression Model in Clinical Practice

James A Proudfoot et al. JAMA Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Importance: Clinical trials of glaucoma therapies focused on protecting the optic nerve have required large sample sizes and lengthy follow-up to detect clinically relevant change due to its slow rate of progression. Whether shorter trials may be possible with more frequent testing and use of rate of change as the end point warrants further investigation.

Objective: To describe the design for the Short-term Assessment of Glaucoma Progression (STAGE) model and provide guidance on sample size and power calculations for shorter clinical trials.

Design, setting, and participants: A cohort study of patients with mild, moderate, or advanced open-angle glaucoma recruited from the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study at the University of California, San Diego. Enrollment began in May 2012 with follow-up for every 3 months for 2 years after baseline examination. Follow-up was concluded in September 2016. Data were analyzed from July 2019 to January 2021. Visual fields (VF) and optic coherence tomography (OCT) scans were obtained at baseline and for 2 years with visits every 3 months.

Exposures: Glaucoma was defined as glaucomatous appearing optic discs classified by disc photographs in at least 1 eye and/or repeatable VF damage at baseline.

Main outcomes and measures: Longitudinal rates of change in retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and VF mean deviation (MD) are estimated in study designs of varying length and observation frequency. Power calculations as functions of study length, observation frequency, and sample size were performed.

Results: In a total referred sample of 97 patients with mild, moderate, or advanced glaucoma (mean [SD] age, 69 [11.4] years; 50 [51.5%] were female; 19 [19.6%]), over the 2-year follow-up, the mean VF 24-2 MD slope was -0.32 dB/y (95% CI, -0.43 to -0.21 dB/y) and the mean RNFL thickness slope was -0.54 μm/y (95% CI, -0.75 to -0.32 μm/y). Sufficient power (80%) to detect similar group differences in the rate of change in both outcomes was attained with total follow-up between 18 months and 2 years and fewer than 300 total participants.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, results from the STAGE model with reduction of the rate of progression as the end point, frequent testing, and a moderate effect size, suggest that clinical trials to test efficacy of glaucoma therapy can be completed within 18 months of follow-up and with fewer than 300 participants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Zangwill reported grants from Heidelberg Engineering (equipment and research support), grants from Carl Zeiss Meditec (equipment and research support), nonfinancial support from Optovue Inc (research equipment), nonfinancial support from Topcon Inc (equipment support), and grants from the National Eye Institute during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Idx (consultant) outside the submitted work; in addition, Dr Zangwill had a patent for UCSD issued by Carl Zeiss Meditec. Dr Medeiros reported grants from Novartis, grants from AbbVie, grants from Carl Zeiss Meditec, personal fees from Reichert, and grants from Heidelberg Engineering during the conduct of the study. Dr Weinreb reported grants from National Eye Institute, other from Carl Zeiss Meditec (equipment support, patent), nonfinancial support from Centervue (equipment support), nonfinancial support from Genentech Research (support), nonfinancial support from Heidelberg Engineering (equipment support), nonfinancial support from Konan (research or equipment support), nonfinancial support from Optovue (equipment support), nonfinancial support from Bausch & Lomb (research support), personal fees from Aerie Pharmaceuticals (consultant), personal fees from Allergan (consultant), personal fees from Eyenovia (consultant), and other from Toromedes (patent) during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Theoretical Trial of Glaucoma Treatment
Power to detect differences in normal and glaucoma change rates by study length and number of observations with fixed total sample size of 150 participants (75 per group, both eyes included). The variance components (ie, random effect and error variances) and effect sizes (ie, difference in change rates) are set equal to the model estimates derived from the 2-year trial with observations 3 months apart (effect size of 0.32 dB/year for visual field [VF] 24-2 mean deviation [MD] and 0.54 μm/year for global retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL] thickness). Study lengths to achieve 80% power are given in blue.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Effect Sizes Associated With a Range of Sample Sizes for Visual Field (VF) 24-2 Mean Deviation (MD)
Detectable VF 24-2 MD effect sizes for glaucoma studies of varying sample size (assuming both eyes are included), follow-up, and observation frequency.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Effect Sizes Associated With a Range of Sample Sizes for Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RFNL) Thickness
Detectable RNFL thickness effect sizes for glaucoma studies of varying sample size (assuming both eyes are included), follow-up, and observation frequency.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weinreb RN, Aung T, Medeiros FA. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. JAMA. 2014;311(18):1901-1911. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.3192 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weinreb RN, Leung CK, Crowston JG, et al. . Primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16067. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.67 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weinreb RN, Kaufman PL. Glaucoma research community and FDA look to the future, II: NEI/FDA Glaucoma Clinical Trial Design and Endpoints Symposium: measures of structural change and visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(11):7842-7851. doi:10.1167/iovs.11-7895 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chauhan BC, Malik R, Shuba LM, Rafuse PE, Nicolela MT, Artes PH. Rates of glaucomatous visual field change in a large clinical population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(7):4135-4143. doi:10.1167/iovs.14-14643 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nassiri N, Moghimi S, Coleman AL, Law SK, Caprioli J, Nouri-Mahdavi K. Global and pointwise rates of decay in glaucoma eyes deteriorating according to pointwise event analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(2):1208-1213. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-10833 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types