What is known and objective: Hyperprolactinemia is a neuroendocrine disease that is responsible for a quarter of cases of secondary amenorrhea, which can lead to infertility in women. Dopaminergic agonists (bromocriptine, cabergoline, quinagolide) can be used in the treatment. However, there is a lack of secondary studies that compare their efficacy and safety, especially through a network meta-analysis. Thus, to contribute to the decision-making, a systematic review and network meta-analyses (NMA) were performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dopaminergic agonists in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia.
Methods: Randomized clinical trials (RCT) were retrieved through PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases. The efficacy and safety of the drugs were compared, considering the following outcomes: prolactin (PRL) levels, number of patients with galactorrhoea, menstrual irregularities and adverse drug reactions. NMA was built for each outcome. Results were reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% credibility intervals. Ranking probabilities were calculated by surface under the cumulative ranking analysis (SUCRA) and Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA).
Results and discussion: Seventeen RCTs were included in the systematic review and fifteen in the meta-analyses. The drugs had similar efficacy, considering the PRL levels. The SUCRA analysis showed that quinagolide (0.075 and 0.05 mg/day) was superior for reducing irregular menstruation, whereas bromocriptine was the best (97%) for galactorrhoea. Cabergoline proved to be the safest drug, except for abdominal pain at a dose of 1 mg/week. The SMAA demonstrated similar results to SUCRA.
What is new and conclusion: This is the first network meta-analysis that evaluated the efficacy and safety of dopaminergic agonists in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia. The results of this review revealed that these drugs have similar efficacy, but cabergoline has a better safety profile.
Keywords: bromocriptine; cabergoline; hyperprolactinemia; meta-analysis; quinagolide; systematic review.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.