Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 2:12:660118.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660118. eCollection 2021.

Placebo From an Enactive Perspective

Affiliations

Placebo From an Enactive Perspective

Iñigo R Arandia et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Due to their complexity and variability, placebo effects remain controversial. We suggest this is also due to a set of problematic assumptions (dualism, reductionism, individualism, passivity). We critically assess current explanations and empirical evidence and propose an alternative theoretical framework-the enactive approach to life and mind-based on recent developments in embodied cognitive science. We review core enactive concepts such as autonomy, agency, and sense-making. Following these ideas, we propose a move from binary distinctions (e.g., conscious vs. non-conscious) to the more workable categories of reflective and pre-reflective activity. We introduce an ontology of individuation, following the work of Gilbert Simondon, that allow us to see placebo interventions not as originating causal chains, but as modulators and triggers in the regulation of tensions between ongoing embodied and interpersonal processes. We describe these interrelated processes involving looping effects through three intertwined dimensions of embodiment: organic, sensorimotor, and intersubjective. Finally, we defend the need to investigate therapeutic interactions in terms of participatory sense-making, going beyond the identification of individual social traits (e.g., empathy, trust) that contribute to placebo effects. We discuss resonances and differences between the enactive proposal, popular explanations such as expectations and conditioning, and other approaches based on meaning responses and phenomenological/ecological ideas.

Keywords: Gilbert Simondon; agency; embodiment; enaction; meaning response; participatory sense-making; placebo & nocebo effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Dimensions of embodiment. Left: the organic (red), sensorimotor (blue), and intersubjective (green) dimensions of embodiment are composed of cycles or loops (circles), interrelated in a non-hierarchical way and deeply influencing each other (arrowed lines between circles). The regulation of each dimension occurs under precarious conditions, that is, in interaction with the environment that can enable, facilitate or constrain internal constitutive processes (lines directed outwards or toward a loop). Right: a disorder in an organic loop (broken red cycle), e.g., arterial disease, can limit sensorimotor capacities (reduced blue circle). A disruption in the organic cycle can begin to be compensated by the sensorimotor dimension (walking therapy), which is supported by the intersubjective loop (interaction with trainers).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alfano M. (2015). Placebo effects and informed consent. Am. J. Bioethics 15, 3–12. 10.1080/15265161.2015.1074302 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allen M., Friston K. J. (2018). From cognitivism to autopoiesis: towards a computational framework for the embodied mind. Synthese 195, 2459–2482. 10.1007/s11229-016-1288-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson M. L. (2010). Neural reuse: a fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 245–266. 10.1017/S0140525X10000853 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson M. L., Richardson M. J., Chemero A. (2012). Eroding the boundaries of cognition: implications of embodiment. Top. Cogn. Sci. 4, 717–730. 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01211.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arntz A., Claassens L. (2004). The meaning of pain influences its experienced intensity. Pain 109, 20–25. 10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.030 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources