Physical Performance in Older Cohorts: A Comparison of 81-Year-Old Swedish Men and Women Born Twelve Years Apart-Results from the Swedish Study "Good Aging in Skåne"

Henrik Ekström; Sölve Elmståhl; Lena Sandin Wranker

doi:10.1155/2021/8813992

Physical Performance in Older Cohorts: A Comparison of 81-Year-Old Swedish Men and Women Born Twelve Years Apart-Results from the Swedish Study "Good Aging in Skåne"

J Aging Res. 2021 Jun 5:2021:8813992. doi: 10.1155/2021/8813992. eCollection 2021.

Authors

Henrik Ekström¹, Sölve Elmståhl¹, Lena Sandin Wranker^{1

2}

Affiliations

¹ Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
² Centre for Ageing and Health, AGECAP, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Abstract

Materials and methods: Birth cohorts of both sexes drawn from the Swedish study "Good Aging in Skåne" for the years 1920-22 and 1932-34 were compared. Walking, the step test, the chair stand test, and the handgrip strength test were used as proxies for the physical performance. The results were adjusted for lifestyle habits and common chronic geriatric diseases.

Results: Both men and women in the later-born cohort walked more quickly and completed the chair stand test faster, and women were also quicker in the step test. No significant differences were found in the grip test, in either the male or female cohorts. Discussion. Normative reference values for physical tests of subjects of different ages can be misleading unless cohort effects are considered. Furthermore, age-related trajectories can also be misinterpreted if cohort effects are neglected which, in the longer perspective, could affect health care planning.

Conclusion: Birth cohort effects should be considered when comparing walking speed, number of steps, chair stands, and the step test, in men and women of older age.