Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 29;18(13):6966.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136966.

Factors Influencing Adjustment to Remote Work: Employees' Initial Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Factors Influencing Adjustment to Remote Work: Employees' Initial Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Ward van Zoonen et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

The COVID-19 crisis has disrupted when, where, and how employees work. Drawing on a sample of 5452 Finnish employees, this study explores the factors associated with employees' abrupt adjustment to remote work. Specifically, this study examines structural factors (i.e., work independence and the clarity of job criteria), relational factors (i.e., interpersonal trust and social isolation), contextual factors of work (i.e., change in work location and perceived disruption), and communication dynamics (i.e., organizational communication quality and communication technology use (CTU)) as mechanisms underlying adjustment to remote work. The findings demonstrate that structural and contextual factors are important predictors of adjustment and that these relationships are moderated by communication quality and CTU. Contrary to previous research, trust in peers and supervisors does not support adjustment to remote work. We discuss the implications of these findings for practice during and beyond times of crisis.

Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; contextual factors; relational factors; remote work; structural factors; work adjustment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hypothesized model.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pouliakas K., Branka J. EU Jobs at Highest Risk of Covid-19 Social Distancing: Will the Pandemic Exacerbate Labour Market Divide? IZA Discussion Paper No. 13281. [(accessed on 17 April 2021)];2020 Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3608530.
    1. Hodder A. New Technology, Work and Employment in the era of COVID-19: Reflecting on legacies of research. New Technol. Work Employ. 2020;35:262–275. doi: 10.1111/ntwe.12173. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carnevale J.B., Hatak I. Employee Adjustment and Well-Being in the Era of COVID-19: Implications for Human Resource Management. J. Bus. Res. 2020;116:183–187. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.037. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cho E. Examining boundaries to understand the impact of COVID-19 on vocational behaviors. J. Vocat. Behav. 2020;119:103437. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103437. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spurk D., Straub C. Flexible employment relationships and careers in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Vocat. Behav. 2020;119:103435. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103435. - DOI - PMC - PubMed