Healthcare personnel's working conditions in relation to risk behaviours for organism transmission: A mixed-methods study
- PMID: 34219318
- DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15940
Healthcare personnel's working conditions in relation to risk behaviours for organism transmission: A mixed-methods study
Abstract
Aims and objectives: To investigate healthcare personnel's working conditions in relation to risk behaviours for organism transmission.
Background: Healthcare personnel's behaviour is often influenced by working conditions that in turn can impact the development of healthcare-associated infections. Observational studies are scarce, and further understanding of working conditions in relation to behaviour is essential for the benefit of the healthcare personnel and the safety of the patients.
Design: A mixed-methods convergent design.
Methods: Data were collected during 104 h of observation at eight hospital units. All 79 observed healthcare personnel were interviewed. Structured interviews covering aspects of working conditions were performed with the respective first-line manager. The qualitative and quantitative data were collected concurrently and given equal priority. Data were analysed separately and then merged. The study follows the GRAMMS guidelines for reporting mixed-methods research.
Results: Regardless of measurable and perceived working conditions, risk behaviours frequently occurred especially missed hand disinfection. Healthcare personnel described staffing levels, patient-level workload, physical factors and interruptions as important conditions that influence infection prevention behaviours. The statistical analyses confirmed that interruptions increase the frequency of risk behaviours. Significantly higher frequencies of risk behaviours also occurred in activities where healthcare personnel worked together, which in the interviews was described as a consequence of caring for high-need patients.
Conclusions: These mixed-methods findings illustrate that healthcare personnel's perceptions do not always correspond to the observed results since risk behaviours frequently occurred regardless of the observed and perceived working conditions. Facilitating the possibility for healthcare personnel to work undisturbed when needed is essential for their benefit and for patient safety.
Relevance for clinical practice: The results can be used to enlighten healthcare personnel and managers and when designing future infection prevention work.
Keywords: healthcare personnel behaviour; healthcare-associated infections; infection prevention; interruptions; mixed methods; working conditions.
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Risk behaviours for organism transmission in daily care activities: a longitudinal observational case study.J Hosp Infect. 2018 Nov;100(3):e146-e150. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.07.041. Epub 2018 Aug 3. J Hosp Infect. 2018. PMID: 30081148
-
MRSA-colonized persons' and healthcare personnel's experiences of patient-professional interactions in and responsibilities for infection prevention in Sweden.J Infect Public Health. 2014 Sep-Oct;7(5):427-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Jun 2. J Infect Public Health. 2014. PMID: 24888790
-
Understanding nursing personnel's health while working in end-of-life care-A hermeneutical study.Scand J Caring Sci. 2024 Mar;38(1):73-81. doi: 10.1111/scs.13193. Epub 2023 Jul 9. Scand J Caring Sci. 2024. PMID: 37424232
-
Psychologically mediated effects of the physical healthcare environment on work-related outcomes of healthcare personnel.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Dec 8;(12):CD006210. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006210.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010. PMID: 21154364 Review.
-
Hand decontamination in clinical practice: a review of the evidence.Br J Nurs. 2017 Apr 27;26(8):448-451. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2017.26.8.448. Br J Nurs. 2017. PMID: 28453321 Review.
Cited by
-
Development and Validation of the Infection Prevention Appraisal Scale.Nurs Rep. 2023 Jan 31;13(1):157-165. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13010017. Nurs Rep. 2023. PMID: 36810268 Free PMC article.
-
Nurses' assessed self-efficacy levels to medical asepsis and their relation to structural empowerment, work engagement and work-related stress.Work. 2023;74(2):501-513. doi: 10.3233/WOR-211305. Work. 2023. PMID: 36314182 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Allegranzi, B., & Pittet, D. (2009). Role of hand hygiene in healthcare-associated infection prevention. Journal of Hospital Infection, 73(4), 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2009.04.019
-
- Bae, S. H. (2011). Assessing the relationships between nurse working conditions and patient outcomes: Systematic literature review. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(6), 700-713. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01291.x
-
- Clack, L., Passerini, S., Wolfensberger, A., Sax, H., & Manser, T. (2018). Frequency and nature of infectious risk moments during acute care based on the INFORM structured classification taxonomy. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 39(3), 272-279. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2017.326
-
- Costar, D. M., & Hall, K. K. (2020). Improving team performance and patient safety on the job through team training and performance support tools: A systematic review. Journal of Patient Safety, 16(3S Suppl 1), S48-S56. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000746
-
- Creswell, J., & Plano, C. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 3rd edn. Sage Publications.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
