In-vivo impact of common cosmetic preservative systems in full formulation on the skin microbiome

PLoS One. 2021 Jul 7;16(7):e0254172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254172. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Preservatives play an essentially role in ensuring that cosmetic formulations remain safe for use via control of microbial contamination. Commonly used preservatives include organic acids, alcohols and phenols and these play an essential role in controlling the growth of bacteria, fungi and moulds in substrates that can potentially act as a rich food source for microbial contaminants. Whilst the activity of these compounds is clear, both in vitro and in formulation, little information exists on the potential impact that common preservative systems, in full formulation, have on the skin's resident microbiome. Dysbiosis of the skin's microbiome has been associated with a number of cosmetic conditions but there currently are no in vivo studies investigating the potential for preservative ingredients, when included in personal care formulations under normal use conditions, to impact the cutaneous microbiome. Here we present an analysis of four in vivo studies that examine the impact of different preservation systems in full formulation, in different products formats, with varying durations of application. This work demonstrates that despite the antimicrobial efficacy of the preservatives in vitro, the skin microbiome is not impacted by preservative containing products in vivo.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Anti-Infective Agents / pharmacology*
  • Chemistry, Pharmaceutical / methods
  • Cosmetics / chemistry*
  • Cosmetics / pharmacology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Microbiota / drug effects*
  • Middle Aged
  • Preservatives, Pharmaceutical / chemistry
  • Skin / microbiology*
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Anti-Infective Agents
  • Cosmetics
  • Preservatives, Pharmaceutical

Grants and funding

I confirm that this work was funded by Unilever Research and Development. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. Barry Murphy, Michael Hoptroff, David Arnold, and Stuart Campbell-Lee contributed to or conducted the study while employed by Unilever. The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors (BM, MH, DA, SCL), but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the Author Contributions section.