MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Screening
- PMID: 34237810
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100852
MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Screening
Abstract
Background: High rates of overdiagnosis are a critical barrier to organized prostate cancer screening. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with targeted biopsy has shown the potential to address this challenge, but the implications of its use in the context of organized prostate cancer screening are unknown.
Methods: We conducted a population-based noninferiority trial of prostate cancer screening in which men 50 to 74 years of age from the general population were invited by mail to participate; participants with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of 3 ng per milliliter or higher were randomly assigned, in a 2:3 ratio, to undergo a standard biopsy (standard biopsy group) or to undergo MRI, with targeted and standard biopsy if the MRI results suggested prostate cancer (experimental biopsy group). The primary outcome was the proportion of men in the intention-to-treat population in whom clinically significant cancer (Gleason score ≥7) was diagnosed. A key secondary outcome was the detection of clinically insignificant cancers (Gleason score 6).
Results: Of 12,750 men enrolled, 1532 had PSA levels of 3 ng per milliliter or higher and were randomly assigned to undergo biopsy: 603 were assigned to the standard biopsy group and 929 to the experimental biopsy group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, clinically significant cancer was diagnosed in 192 men (21%) in the experimental biopsy group, as compared with 106 men (18%) in the standard biopsy group (difference, 3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1 to 7; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The percentage of clinically insignificant cancers was lower in the experimental biopsy group than in the standard biopsy group (4% [41 participants] vs. 12% [73 participants]; difference, -8 percentage points; 95% CI, -11 to -5).
Conclusions: MRI with targeted and standard biopsy in men with MRI results suggestive of prostate cancer was noninferior to standard biopsy for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in a population-based screening-by-invitation trial and resulted in less detection of clinically insignificant cancer. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; STHLM3-MRI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03377881.).
Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Comment in
-
Urological Oncology: Prostate Cancer.J Urol. 2022 Jan;207(1):229-231. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002285. Epub 2021 Oct 18. J Urol. 2022. PMID: 34662205 No abstract available.
-
MRI-Targeted Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Screening.N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 25;385(22):2109-2110. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2115775. N Engl J Med. 2021. PMID: 34818496 No abstract available.
-
MRI-Targeted Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Screening.N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 25;385(22):2110. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2115775. N Engl J Med. 2021. PMID: 34818497 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Prostate cancer screening using a combination of risk-prediction, MRI, and targeted prostate biopsies (STHLM3-MRI): a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.Lancet Oncol. 2021 Sep;22(9):1240-1249. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00348-X. Epub 2021 Aug 13. Lancet Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34391509 Clinical Trial.
-
Biomarker vs MRI-Enhanced Strategies for Prostate Cancer Screening: The STHLM3-MRI Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e247131. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.7131. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38648061 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Results after Four Years of Screening for Prostate Cancer with PSA and MRI.N Engl J Med. 2024 Sep 26;391(12):1083-1095. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2406050. N Engl J Med. 2024. PMID: 39321360 Clinical Trial.
-
Seminar: Revisiting the value of PSA-based prostate cancer screening Essay No 5: Should men undergo MRI before prostate biopsy? (Pro).Urol Oncol. 2023 Feb;41(2):88-91. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.04.016. Epub 2022 Jul 22. Urol Oncol. 2023. PMID: 35871993 Review.
-
Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review.Eur Urol. 2013 Jan;63(1):125-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jun 13. Eur Urol. 2013. PMID: 22743165 Review.
Cited by
-
Optimizing Multiparametric MRI Protocols for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Comprehensive Assessment Aligned with PI-RADS Guidelines.Health Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 19;7(11):e70172. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70172. eCollection 2024 Nov. Health Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39564352 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of a prognostic blood-based sphingolipid panel for men with localized prostate cancer followed on active surveillance.Biomark Res. 2024 Nov 9;12(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s40364-024-00678-7. Biomark Res. 2024. PMID: 39522029 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective evaluation of PI-RADSv2.1 using multiparametric and biparametric MRI for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer based on MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy.Jpn J Radiol. 2024 Oct 16. doi: 10.1007/s11604-024-01675-4. Online ahead of print. Jpn J Radiol. 2024. PMID: 39412644
-
In Vivo Feasibility Study: Evaluating Autonomous Data-Driven Robotic Needle Trajectory Correction in MRI-Guided Transperineal Procedures.IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2024 Oct;9(10):8975-8982. doi: 10.1109/lra.2024.3455940. Epub 2024 Sep 6. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2024. PMID: 39371576
-
Role of Systematic Biopsy in the Era of Targeted Biopsy: A Review.Curr Oncol. 2024 Sep 3;31(9):5171-5194. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31090383. Curr Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39330011 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous