Durability of the Therapeutic Effect of Restorative Neurostimulation for Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain
- PMID: 34242440
- PMCID: PMC8456956
- DOI: 10.1111/ner.13477
Durability of the Therapeutic Effect of Restorative Neurostimulation for Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of the ongoing follow-up of ReActiv8-A clinical trial is to document the longitudinal benefits of episodic stimulation of the dorsal ramus medial branch and consequent contraction of the lumbar multifidus in patients with refractory mechanical chronic low back pain (CLBP). We report the four-year outcomes of this trial.
Materials and methods: ReActiv8-A is a prospective, single-arm trial performed at nine sites in the United Kingdom, Belgium, and Australia. Eligible patients had disabling CLBP (low back pain Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] ≥6; Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] ≥25), no indications for spine surgery or spinal cord stimulation, and failed conventional management including at least physical therapy and medications for low back pain. Fourteen days postimplantation, stimulation parameters were programmed to elicit strong, smooth contractions of the multifidus, and participants were given instructions to activate the device for 30-min stimulation-sessions twice daily. Annual follow-up through four years included collection of NRS, ODI, and European Quality of Life Score on Five Dimensions (EQ-5D). Background on mechanisms, trial design, and one-year outcomes were previously described.
Results: At baseline (N = 53) (mean ± SD) age was 44 ± 10 years; duration of back pain was 14 ± 11 years, NRS was 6.8 ± 0.8, ODI 44.9 ± 10.1, and EQ-5D 0.434 ± 0.185. Mean improvements from baseline were statistically significant (p < 0.001) and clinically meaningful for all follow-ups. Patients completing year 4 follow-up, reported mean (±standard error of the mean) NRS: 3.2 ± 0.4, ODI: 23.0 ± 3.2, and EQ-5D: 0.721 ± 0.035. Moreover, 73% of participants had a clinically meaningful improvement of ≥2 points on NRS, 76% of ≥10 points on ODI, and 62.5% had a clinically meaningful improvement in both NRS and ODI and 97% were (very) satisfied with treatment.
Conclusions: In participants with disabling intractable CLBP who receive long-term restorative neurostimulation, treatment satisfaction remains high and improvements in pain, disability, and quality-of-life are clinically meaningful and durable through four years.
Keywords: Chronic low back pain; long-term effect; multifidus muscle impaired neuromuscular control; restorative neurostimulation.
© 2021 The Authors. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Neuromodulation Society.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Multifidus dysfunction and restorative neurostimulation: a scoping review.Pain Med. 2023 Dec 1;24(12):1341-1354. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnad098. Pain Med. 2023. PMID: 37439698 Free PMC article. Review.
-
New Therapy for Refractory Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain-Restorative Neurostimulation to Activate the Lumbar Multifidus: One Year Results of a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial.Neuromodulation. 2018 Jan;21(1):48-55. doi: 10.1111/ner.12741. Epub 2017 Dec 15. Neuromodulation. 2018. PMID: 29244235 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Term Outcomes of Restorative Neurostimulation in Patients With Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain Secondary to Multifidus Dysfunction: Two-Year Results of the ReActiv8-B Pivotal Trial.Neuromodulation. 2023 Jan;26(1):87-97. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2021.10.011. Epub 2021 Dec 18. Neuromodulation. 2023. PMID: 35088722 Clinical Trial.
-
Three-Year Durability of Restorative Neurostimulation Effectiveness in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain and Multifidus Muscle Dysfunction.Neuromodulation. 2023 Jan;26(1):98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.08.457. Epub 2022 Sep 27. Neuromodulation. 2023. PMID: 36175320 Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S69-74. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef6de. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011. PMID: 21897347 Review.
Cited by
-
International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Statement: Restorative Neurostimulation for Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain Resulting From Neuromuscular Instability.Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):728-750. doi: 10.14444/8525. Epub 2023 Aug 10. Int J Spine Surg. 2023. PMID: 37562978 Free PMC article.
-
Multifidus dysfunction and restorative neurostimulation: a scoping review.Pain Med. 2023 Dec 1;24(12):1341-1354. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnad098. Pain Med. 2023. PMID: 37439698 Free PMC article. Review.
-
ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs. Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial for the Treatment of Intractable Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain (RESTORE Trial Protocol).Pain Ther. 2023 Apr;12(2):607-620. doi: 10.1007/s40122-023-00475-4. Epub 2023 Feb 14. Pain Ther. 2023. PMID: 36787013 Free PMC article.
-
Restorative Neurostimulation: A Clinical Guide for Therapy Adoption.J Pain Res. 2022 Jun 20;15:1759-1774. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S364081. eCollection 2022. J Pain Res. 2022. PMID: 35756364 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical utility and reproducibility of surface electromyography in individuals with chronic low back pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2022 May 16;12(5):e058652. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058652. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35577472 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Maher C, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Non‐specific low back pain. Lancet 2017;389:736–747. - PubMed
-
- Hartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet 2018;391:2356–2367. - PubMed
-
- Foster NE, Anema JR, Cherkin D et al. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. Lancet 2018;391:2368–2383. - PubMed
-
- Hayden JA, Van Tulder MW, Malmivaara AV et al. Meta‐analysis: exercise therapy for nonspecific low back pain. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:765–775. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
