[Comparative study of short-term efficacy,effectiveness and safety at different stages of the laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy learning curve]

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jul 1;59(7):618-623. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20210330-00147.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To compare short-term efficacy,effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy(LPD) learning curve at different stages and at the same time with open pancreaticoduodenectomy(OPD). Methods: Clinical data of 488 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery,Affiliated Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology from July 2014 to December 2016 were collected. There were 40 cases at the groping stage of LPD surgery(100 cases at the same time of OPD),64 cases at the stable stage (89 cases at the same time of OPD),and 118 cases at the mature stage(77 cases at the same time of OPD).The clinical data of LPD and OPD in the same period were compared and analyzed by χ2 test,t test and U test,respectively. Results: There was no significant difference in preoperative indicators between the two groups at the three stages(all P>0.05). In terms of intraoperative blood volume of the LPD group was significantly lower than that of the OPD group at three stages(M(QR))(111.1(150.0)ml(range:0 to 700 ml) vs. 393.9(400.0)ml(range:0 to 3 000 ml),120.8(115.0)ml(range:0 to 1 000 ml) vs. 442.9(450.0)ml(range:0 to 2 000 ml) and 150.0(200.0)ml(range:10 to 1 500 ml) vs. 364.3(400.0)ml(range:0 to 1 500 ml))(all P<0.05). And in terms of operation time of the LPD group was significantly higher than that of the OPD group at the groping stage((461.1±123.9)min(range:220 to 690 minutes) vs. (385.9±113.9)minutes(range:150 to 655 minutes))(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference between the LPD group and the OPD group at the stable and mature stage(P>0.05). The incidence of B+C level pancreatic fistula of the LPD group was higher than that of the OPD group at groping stage(17.5% vs. 3.0%)(P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the LPD group and the OPD group at the stable and mature stage(P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative rebleeding(27.5%),bile leakage(20.0%) and abdominal infection(20.0%) of the LPD group was higher than those of the OPD group(11.0%(11/100),5.0%(5/100) and 7.0%(7/100)) at groping stage. There were no significant differences between the LPD group and the OPD group at the stable and mature stage(P>0.05). There were no significant differences of incidence gastrointestinal leakage,hepatic failure,renal failure,cardiac failure,pulmonary infection and 30-day death between the LPD group and the OPD group(all P>0.05). The incidence rate of gastroplegia in the LPD group was lower than that in the OPD group at the stable and mature stage(26.5%(17/64) vs. 44.9%(40/89) and 24.5%(29/118) vs. 38.9%(30/77))(all P<0.05),there was no significant difference between the LPD group and the OPD group at the groping stage(P>0.05). In terms of other incidence of complications,there were no significant differences between the LPD group and the OPD group at three stages(all P>0.05). There were no significant differences of positive margin rate of pancreas,bile duct,retroperitoneum,vascular channel,uncinate process and rate of R0 resection between the LPD group and the OPD group at three stages(all P>0.05). In terms of numbers of lymph nodes,there was no significant difference between the LPD group and the OPD group at three stages(all P>0.05).Postoperative hospital stay of the LPD group was shorter than that of the OPD group at the stable stage((14.8±6.9)days(range:10 to 38 days) vs. (17.0±9.0)days(range:4 to 56 days)) and the mature stage((13.0±7.4)days(range:3 to 57 days) vs. (15.8±6.7)days(range:6 to 69 days)(all P<0.05). Conclusion: with the stable and mature learning curve of LPD surgery,compared with traditional OPD surgery,it has the characteristics of less intraoperative bleeding,shorter postoperative hospitalization,lower incidence of delay gastric empty,safe and effective.

目的: 比较处于腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)学习曲线不同阶段医师施行的LPD与同期开腹胰十二指肠切除术(OPD)治疗患者的近期效果。 方法: 在前期多中心LPD学习曲线研究的基础上,回顾性收集2014年7月至2016年12月于华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院胆胰外科接受胰十二指肠切除术的488例患者的资料,其中LPD手术222例,OPD手术266例。LPD初始阶段为2014年7月至2015年1月,共实施LPD 40例,同期实施OPD 100例;稳定阶段为2015年1-12月,共实施LPD 64例,同期实施OPD 89例;成熟阶段为2016年1-12月,共实施LPD 118例,同期实施OPD 77例。通过χ²检验、t检验或U检验比较组间围手术期临床数据的差异。 结果: 两组术前各项指标在三个阶段的差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。初始阶段LPD组患者的手术时间(461.1±123.9)min(范围:220~690 min)长于OPD组的(385.9±113.9)min(范围:150~655 min)(P<0.05),在稳定阶段及成熟阶段两组差异无统计学意义(P值均>0.05);三个阶段LPD组的术中出血量[MQR)]为111.1(150.0)ml (范围:0~700 ml)、120.8(115.0)ml(范围:0~1 000 ml)和150.0(200.0)ml(范围:10~1 500 ml),均低于OPD组的393.9(400.0)ml(范围:0~3 000 ml)、442.9(450.0)ml(范围:0~2 000 ml)和364.3(400.0)ml(范围:0~1 500 ml)(P值均<0.05);初始阶段LPD组的术中补液量[(3 563.4±1 179.7)ml(范围:1 500~7 225 ml)]少于OPD组[(4 160.8±1 753.1)ml(范围:800~10 100 ml)](P<0.05),其余阶段无差异(P值均>0.05);初始阶段LPD组的术后胃排空延迟发生率与OPD组无差异(P>0.05),其余两个阶段少于OPD组 [26.5%(17/64)比44.9%(40/89)和24.5%(29/118)比38.9%(30/77)](P值均<0.05);初始阶段LPD组的B、C级胰瘘的发生率为17.5%(7/40),高于OPD组的3.0%(3/100)(P<0.05),在稳定阶段和成熟阶段两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);初始阶段LPD组的术后出血[27.5%(11/40)]、胆瘘[20.0%(8/40)]及腹腔感染[20.0%(8/40)]的发生率均高于OPD组[11.0%(11/100)、5.0%(5/100) 和7.0%(7/100)](P值均<0.05),在稳定阶段及成熟阶段两组无差异(P>0.05);初始阶段LPD组的术后住院时间与OPD组无差异(P>0.05),稳定阶段[(14.8±6.9)d(范围:10~38 d)]和成熟阶段[(13.0±7.4)d(范围:3~57 d)]则低于OPD组[(17.0±9.0)d(范围:4~56 d)和(15.8±6.7)d(范围:6~69 d)](P值均<0.05)。两组三个阶段其他资料的差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。 结论: 随着手术学习曲线稳定成熟,与OPD相比,LPD具有术中出血量少、术后住院时间短、胃排空延迟发生率低的特点。.

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy*
  • Learning Curve
  • Length of Stay
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms* / surgery
  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Retrospective Studies