Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 7;21(85):e112-e126.
doi: 10.15557/JoU.2021.0020. Epub 2021 Jun 18.

Reference values for the cross-sectional area of normal radial nerve at two levels using high-resolution ultrasonography

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Reference values for the cross-sectional area of normal radial nerve at two levels using high-resolution ultrasonography

Kunwar Pal Singh et al. J Ultrason. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Aim of the study: High-resolution ultrasound is less often used to evaluate the radial nerves. The radial nerve is often involved in entrapment syndromes. The aim of the study is to establish the reference values for the cross-sectional area of the normal radial nerve on high-resolution ultrasonography, and to identify relationships between the cross-sectional area and the subject's age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, and hand dominance.

Material and methods: The study was conducted on 200 subjects of both sexes, between 18 and 75 years of age, who did not have history of peripheral neuropathy or trauma to the upper limb. High-resolution real-time sonographic examination of the radial nerves was performed in both arms at two different levels. Level 1 was taken just proximal to the nerve bifurcation, and level 2 just after the nerve exits the spiral grove.

Results: The mean cross-sectional area measured at level 2 (4.3 ± 0.4 mm2) was greater than that measured at level 1 (2.3 ± 0.3 mm2). No significant relationship was seen with age and hand dominance (p >0.05), but the cross-sectional area values at above mentioned levels were larger in males than in females (p <0.05). In addition, the cross-sectional areas of the radial nerves showed a positive correlation with height, weight, and body mass index (p <0.05).

Conclusion: The established ultrasonographic reference values along with basic clinical data will aid in the diagnosis, response to treatment, and prognostic evaluation of peripheral neuropathies.

Keywords: cross-sectional area; high resolution ultrasonography; peripheral nerves; radial nerve; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest The authors do not report any financial or personal connections with other persons or organizations which might negatively affect the contents of this publication and/or claim authorship rights to this publication.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
High-resolution ultrasonography of the radial nerve of the right upper limb done with the patient in supine position using a high-resolution linear transducer (5–18 MHz) at the level of the elbow just proximal to its bifurcation into the superficial sensory nerve and posterior interosseous nerve (level 1)
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Ultrasonographic cross-sectional area values of the normal radial nerve (arrows) of the right and left upper limbs in the axial plane at level 1 in a 70-year-old male weighing 60 kg, with a height of 167 cm and a body mass index of 21.4 kg/m2. The mean cross-sectional area on the right (A, B, C) and left (D, E, F) sides are 2.4 mm2 and 2.5 mm2, respectively (yellow arrow – radial nerve, RT – right, LT – left. PT – point, VAL – value)
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
High-resolution ultrasonography of the radial nerve of the right upper limb done with the patient in supine position using a high-resolution linear transducer (5–18 MHz) at the anterolateral aspect of the mid-humerus just after it exits the spiral groove (level 2)
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Ultrasonographic cross-sectional area values of the normal radial nerve (arrows) of the right and left upper limbs in the axial plane at level 2 in a 70-year-old male weighing 60 kg, with a height of 167 cm and a body mass index of 21.4 kg/m2. The mean cross-sectional area on the right (A, B, C) and left (D, E, F) sides are 4.5 mm2 and 4.8 mm2, respectively (yellow arrow – radial nerve, RT – right, LT – left. PT – point, VAL – value)
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Ultrasonographic cross-sectional area values of the normal radial nerve (arrows) of the right upper limb in the axial plane at level 1 (A, B, C) and level 2 (D, E, F) in a 63-year-old female weighing 87 kg, with a height of 162 cm and a body mass index of 33.2 kg/m2. The mean cross-sectional areas at level 1 and level 2 are 2.9 mm2 and 5.4 mm2, respectively (yellow arrow – radial nerve, RT – right, LT – left. PT – point, VAL – value)
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Ultrasonographic cross-sectional area values of the normal radial nerve (arrows) of the left upper limb in the axial plane at level 1 (A, B, C) and level 2 (D, E, F) in a 63-year-old female weighing 87 kg, with a height of 162 cm and a body mass index of 33.2 kg/m2. The mean cross-sectional areas at level 1 and level 2 are 2.9 mm2 and 5.2 mm2, respectively (yellow arrow – radial nerve, RT – right, LT – left. PT – point, VAL – value)
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Ultrasonographic cross-sectional area values of the normal radial nerve (arrows) of the right upper limb in the axial plane at level 1 (A, B, C) and level 2 (D, E, F) in a 64-year-old male weighing 83 kg, with a height of 180 cm and a body mass index of 25.6 kg/m2. The mean cross-sectional areas at level 1 and level 2 are 2.9 mm2 and 5.8 mm2, respectively (yellow arrow – radial nerve, RT – right, LT – left. PT – point, VAL – value)
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.
Ultrasonographic cross-sectional area values of the normal radial nerve (arrows) of the left upper limb in the axial plane at level 1 (A, B, C) and level 2 (D, E, F) in a 64-year-old male weighing 83 kg, with a height of 180 cm and a body mass index of 25.6 kg/m2. The mean cross-sectional areas at level 1 and level 2 are 2.9 mm2 and 5.4 mm2, respectively (yellow arrow – radial nerve, RT – right, LT – left. PT – point, VAL – value)
Fig. 9.
Fig. 9.
Ultrasonographic cross-sectional area values of the normal radial nerve (arrows) of the right upper limb in the axial plane at level 1 (A, B, C) and level 2 (D, E, F) in a 26-year-old female weighing 53 kg, with a height of 154 cm and a body mass index of 22.3 kg/m2. The mean cross-sectional areas at level 1 and level 2 are 1.6 mm2 and 3.5 mm2, respectively (yellow arrow – radial nerve, RT – right, LT – left. PT – point, VAL – value)
Fig. 10.
Fig. 10.
Ultrasonographic cross-sectional area values of the normal radial nerve (arrows) of the left upper limb in the axial plane at level 1 (A, B, C) and level 2 (D, E, F) in a 26-year-old female weighing 53 kg, with a height of 154 cm and a body mass index of 22.3 kg/m2. The mean cross-sectional areas at level 1 and level 2 are 1.7 mm2 and 3.6 mm2, respectively (yellow arrow – radial nerve, RT – right, LT – left, PT – point, VAL – value)
Fig. 11.
Fig. 11.
Ultrasonographic cross-sectional area values of the normal radial nerve (arrows) of the right upper limb in the axial plane at level 1 (A, B, C) and level 2 (D, E, F) in a 21-year-old male weighing 55 kg, with a height of 154 cm and a body mass index of 23.2 kg/m2. The mean cross-sectional areas at level 1 and level 2 are 1.7 mm2 and 3.9 mm2, respectively (yellow arrow – radial nerve, RT – right, LT – left. PT – point, VAL – value)
Fig. 12.
Fig. 12.
Ultrasonographic cross-sectional area values of the normal radial nerve (arrows) of the left upper limb in the axial plane at level 1 (A, B, C) and level 2 (D, E, F) in a 21-year-old male weighing 55 kg, with a height of 154 cm and a body mass index of 23.2 kg/m2. The mean cross-sectional areas at level 1 and level 2 are 1.8 mm2 and 3.8 mm2, respectively (yellow arrow – radial nerve, RT – right, LT – left. PT – point, VAL – value)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cartwright MS, Chloros GD, Walker FO, Wiesler ER, Campbell WW: Diagnostic ultrasound for nerve transection. Muscle Nerve 2007; 35: 796–799. - PubMed
    1. Lee FC, Singh H, Nazarian LN, Ratliff JK.: High-resolution ultrasonography in the diagnosis and intraoperative management of peripheral nerve lesions. J Neurosurg 2011; 114: 206–211. - PubMed
    1. Kleinert JM, Mehta S: Radial nerve entrapment. Orthop Clin North Am 1996; 27: 305–315. - PubMed
    1. Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Pugliese F, Bacigalupo L, Gauglio C, Valle M. et al.: Sonography of entrapment neuropathies in the upper limb (wrist excluded). J Clin Ultrasound 2004; 32: 438–450. - PubMed
    1. Ng ES, Vijayan J, Therimadasamy AK, Tan TC, Chan YC, Lim A. et al.: High resolution ultrasonography in the diagnosis of ulnar nerve lesions with particular reference to post-traumatic lesions and sites outside the elbow. Clin Neurophysiol 2011; 122: 188–193. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources