Plan Quality Comparisons Between 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT Based on 4D-CT for Gastric MALT Lymphoma

Anticancer Res. 2021 Aug;41(8):3941-3947. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15190.

Abstract

Background/aim: We compared three-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma using four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) images.

Patients and methods: Three treatment plans of 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT with 30 Gy were created based on 4D-CT images of seven patients. We calculated D95, homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI) of planning target volume, and organs at risk doses.

Results: There was no significant difference among the three plans in D95. HI of the IMRT plan was significantly better than that of the VMAT (p=0.047) and 3D-CRT (p=0.047) plans. CIs of the IMRT and VMAT plans were significantly better than those of the 3D-CRT plan (p=0.047 and p=0.047, respectively). Dmean of the liver for 3D-CRT was significantly higher than that for the IMRT (p=0.047) and VMAT (p=0.047) plans.

Conclusion: The IMRT plan yields the best plan quality for gastric MALT lymphoma.

Keywords: Gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma; four-dimensional computed tomography; intensity-modulated radiotherapy; planning study; radiotherapy; respiratory motion; volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography
  • Humans
  • Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone / diagnostic imaging*
  • Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone / radiotherapy*
  • Radiotherapy Dosage
  • Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted*
  • Stomach Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Stomach Neoplasms / radiotherapy*