Manchester Triage System: assessment in an emergency hospital service

Rev Bras Enferm. 2021 Jul 14;74(3):e20201361. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2020-1361. eCollection 2021.
[Article in English, Portuguese]

Abstract

Objectives: to analyze demographic data, clinical profile and outcomes of patients in emergency services according to Manchester Triage System's priority level.

Methods: a cross-sectional, analytical study, carried out with 3,624 medical records. For statistical analysis, the Chi-Square Test was used.

Results: white individuals were more advanced in age. In the red and white categories, there was a higher percentage of men when compared to women (p=0.0018) and higher prevalence of personal history. Yellow priority patients had higher percentage of pain (p<0.0001). Those in red category had a higher frequency of altered vital signs, external causes, and death outcome. There was a higher percentage of exams performed and hospitalization in the orange category. Blue priority patients had a higher percentage of non-specific complaints and dismissal after risk stratification.

Conclusions: a higher percentage of altered vital signs, number of tests performed, hospitalization and death were evidenced in Manchester protocol's high priority categories.

MeSH terms

  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Emergency Medical Services*
  • Emergency Service, Hospital
  • Female
  • Hospitalization
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Triage*