Publication bias is the consequence of a lack of diversity, equity, and inclusion

J Vasc Surg. 2021 Aug;74(2S):111S-117S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.03.049.

Abstract

Publication bias has been shown to exist in research across medical and surgical specialties. Bias can occur at any stage of the publication process and can be related to race, ethnicity, age, religion, sex, gender, or sexual orientation. Although some improvements have been made toward addressing this issue, bias still spans the publication process from authors and peer reviewers, to editorial board members and editors, with poor inclusion of women and underrepresented minorities throughout. The result of bias remaining unchecked is the publication of research that leaves out certain groups, is not applicable to all people, and can result in harm to some populations. We have highlighted the current landscape of publication bias and strived to demonstrate the importance of addressing it. We have also provided solutions for reducing bias at multiple stages throughout the publication process. Increasing diversity, equity, and inclusion throughout all aspects of the publication process, requiring diversity, equity, and inclusion statements in reports, and providing specific education and guidelines will ensure the identification and eradication of publication bias. By following these measures, we hope that publication bias will be eliminated, which will reduce further harm to certain populations and promote better, more effective research pertinent to all people.

Keywords: Diversity; Equity; Inclusion; Publication bias.

MeSH terms

  • Biomedical Research*
  • Cultural Diversity*
  • Female
  • Gender Equity
  • Homophobia
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Peer Review, Research*
  • Periodicals as Topic*
  • Prejudice*
  • Publication Bias*
  • Race Factors
  • Racism
  • Sex Factors
  • Sexism
  • Sexual and Gender Minorities