Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 9:12:697703.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697703. eCollection 2021.

Validation and Prediction of the School Psychological Capital Among Chinese College Students

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Validation and Prediction of the School Psychological Capital Among Chinese College Students

Xia Kang et al. Front Psychol. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

This study validated the school psychological capital (PsyCap) scale in the Chinese context and examined the predictive effect of PsyCap resources on academic engagement and achievement emotions. Self-report data for PsyCap resources, student engagement, enjoyment, anxiety, and boredom toward English learning were collected from 1,000 sophomores. Item-level analyses and confirmatory factor analysis were used to verify the validity of the school PsyCap scale, and structural equation modeling was applied to reveal the predictive effect of school PsyCap resources on academic engagement and achievement emotions. Results showed that the school PsyCap scale retained superior psychometric properties. Besides, PsyCap resources were demonstrated to have a positive relationship to academic engagement and enjoyment, and a negative relationship to anxiety and boredom. The effectiveness of the school PsyCap scale was verified among Chinese college students, and besides the traditional predictors, school PsyCap is also critically important for students' academic engagement and achievement emotions. Limitations and implications are discussed.

Keywords: academic engagement; achievement emotions; college students; school psychological capital; validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Final structural equation model on school PsyCap and academic outcomes. EFF, self-efficacy; HO, hope; RES, resilience; OPT, optimism; BE, behavioral engagement; EOE, emotional engagement; COE, cognitive engagement. All parameters in the figure are standardized coefficient and all paths are significant at p < 0.001. For brevity reason, the residuals are not presented in the figure. Gender and age are the covariates.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akanni A. A., Kareem D. B., Oduaran C. A. (2019). Emotional intelligence and work engagement among bank workers: moderated mediation model of ethical leadership and job burnout. Int. J. Work Organ. Emot. 10, 322–338. 10.1504/IJWOE.2019.106885 - DOI
    1. Aspinwall L. G., Leaf S. L. (2002). In search of the unique aspects of hope: pinning our hopes on positive emotions, future-oriented thinking, hard times, and other people. Psychol. Inq. 13, 276–288. 10.1207/S15327965PLI1304_02 - DOI
    1. Avey J. B., Patera J. L., West B. J. (2006). The implications of positive psychological capital on employee absenteeism. J. Leadersh. Org. Stud. 13, 42–60. 10.1177/10717919070130020401 - DOI
    1. Avey J. B., Wernsing T. S., Mhatre K. H. (2011). A longitudinal analysis of positive psychological constructs and emotions on stress, anxiety, and wellbeing. J. Leadersh. Org. Stud. 18, 216–228. 10.1177/1548051810397368 - DOI
    1. Ayala J. C., Manzano G. (2018). Academic performance of first-year university students: the influence of resilience and engagement. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 37, 1321–1335. 10.1080/07294360.2018.1502258 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources