Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 7;49(15):8573-8591.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab642.

TDRD3 promotes DHX9 chromatin recruitment and R-loop resolution

Affiliations

TDRD3 promotes DHX9 chromatin recruitment and R-loop resolution

Wei Yuan et al. Nucleic Acids Res. .

Abstract

R-loops, which consist of a DNA/RNA hybrid and a displaced single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), are increasingly recognized as critical regulators of chromatin biology. R-loops are particularly enriched at gene promoters, where they play important roles in regulating gene expression. However, the molecular mechanisms that control promoter-associated R-loops remain unclear. The epigenetic 'reader' Tudor domain-containing protein 3 (TDRD3), which recognizes methylarginine marks on histones and on the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II, was previously shown to recruit DNA topoisomerase 3B (TOP3B) to relax negatively supercoiled DNA and prevent R-loop formation. Here, we further characterize the function of TDRD3 in R-loop metabolism and introduce the DExH-box helicase 9 (DHX9) as a novel interaction partner of the TDRD3/TOP3B complex. TDRD3 directly interacts with DHX9 via its Tudor domain. This interaction is important for recruiting DHX9 to target gene promoters, where it resolves R-loops in a helicase activity-dependent manner to facilitate gene expression. Additionally, TDRD3 also stimulates the helicase activity of DHX9. This stimulation relies on the OB-fold of TDRD3, which likely binds the ssDNA in the R-loop structure. Thus, DHX9 functions together with TOP3B to suppress promoter-associated R-loops. Collectively, these findings reveal new functions of TDRD3 and provide important mechanistic insights into the regulation of R-loop metabolism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
TDRD3 interacts with DHX9. (A) Tandem affinity purification of the TOP3B protein complex (TOP3B.com) from HEK293 cells. The eluted protein complex was separated by SDS-PAGE and silver-stained (left panel). The number of unique peptides from the top four purified proteins is shown (right panel). (B) The interaction of DHX9 with TDRD3 and TOP3B was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP). MCF7 cells were immunoprecipitated with control IgG and αTOP3B antibodies. The eluted protein samples were detected by western blot analysis using αDHX9, αTDRD3 and αTOP3B antibodies. (C) The interaction of DHX9 with TDRD3 and TOP3B was detected by co-IP in wild type (WT) and TDRD3 knockout (KO) MCF7 cells using two different αTDRD3 antibodies (Ab1 and Ab2). TDRD3, TOP3B and DHX9 were detected in the input samples by western blot analysis. (D) TOP3B is dispensable for the TDRD3-DHX9 interaction. Both WT and TOP3B KO MCF7 cells were transfected with Flag-TDRD3. The interaction of TDRD3 with DHX9 and TOP3B was detected by co-IP. (E) TDRD3 is essential for the TOP3B-DHX9 interaction. Both WT and TDRD3 KO MCF7 cells were transfected with Flag-TOP3B. The interaction of TOP3B with DHX9 and TDRD3 was detected by co-IP. (F) TDRD3 directly interacts with DHX9. Flag-DHX9 recombinant proteins were purified from HEK293 cells. GST, GST-TDRD3, and GST-TOP3B recombinant proteins were purified from E. coli. The interactions of GST-tagged recombinant proteins with Flag-DHX9 were assessed by GST pull-down and western blot analysis using an αFlag antibody. The amount of proteins used in the binding was visualized by the Ponceau S staining of the PVDF membrane.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Characterization of the interaction between DHX9 and TDRD3. (A) Mapping the region of TDRD3 that interacts with DHX9. GST-tagged TDRD3 truncation constructs were generated, containing the oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding (OB)-fold, the ubiquitin-associated domain (UBA; wild type or with L324A mutation), and the Tudor domain (Tudor; wild type or with E691K mutation), respectively. A graphic summary of their interactions with DHX9 is shown. A GST pull-down assay was performed by incubating the recombinant GST-fusion proteins with MCF7 cell lysates. The pull-down samples were detected by western blot analysis using an αDHX9 antibody. The GST-fusion proteins were visualized by Ponceau staining. (B) Mapping the region of DHX9 that interacts with TDRD3. GFP-tagged full-length or truncations of DHX9 constructs were generated. The locations of the N-terminal double-stranded RNA binding domain (dsRBD), the helicase domain (HD), and the C-terminal RGG-containing domain (RGG) are indicated (upper panel). A graphic summary of their interactions with TDRD3 is shown. A GST pull-down assay was performed by incubating the recombinant GST-Tudor with MCF7 lysates that were transfected with different GFP-DHX9 fusion vectors. Both the input and pull-down samples were detected by western blot analysis using an αGFP antibody. The GST-Tudor recombinant protein used in the binding was visualized by Ponceau staining. (C) The interaction of TDRD3 with DHX9 requires a functional Tudor domain. A co-IP assay was performed to assess the interaction of Flag-tagged WT and methylarginine binding-deficient (E691K) TDRD3 with endogenous DHX9 in MCF7 cells. The input and αFlag antibody-immunoprecipitated samples were analyzed by western blot using indicated antibodies. (D) DHX9 interacts with TDRD3 in an arginine methylation-dependent manner. The interaction of DHX9 with TDRD3 was detected by co-IP in MCF7 cells treated with vehicle (−) or with the type I PRMT inhibitor MS023 (+). The level of cellular ADMA was detected by western blot using a pan-ADMA antibody (ASYM26). The DHX9-immunoprecipitated samples were probed for methylation and interactions with TDRD3 using the ASYM26 and αTDRD3 antibodies.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
TDRD3 recruits DHX9 to its target gene promoters. (A) A pie-chart demonstration of genes with TDRD3 bound to their promoters and genes up- or down-regulated after TDRD3 knockout (KO) in MCF7 cells. (B) Genes showing more than a 2-fold reduction in TDRD3 KO versus wild type (WT) MCF7 cells were selected for further analysis. The relative expression of each gene in both KO clones is shown. (C) UCSC Genome Browser plots of TDRD3 ChIP-seq reads along the indicated genes in MCF7 cells. The y-axis represents the normalized number of reads; the thick blue boxes represent the open reading frames; and the transcription start site (TSS) is labeled. (D) A ChIP-reChIP assay was performed to detect the co-occupancy of TDRD3 and DHX9 at target gene promoters. The first round of ChIP was performed using control IgG and αTDRD3 antibodies, and the second round of ChIP (reChIP) was performed using IgG and αDHX9 antibodies. ChIP DNA was analyzed by qPCR using primers for the indicated gene promoters. (E) TDRD3 KO does not affect DHX9 protein expression. TDRD3 and DHX9 were detected in WT and TDRD3 KO MCF7 cells by western blot analysis. ACTIN was used as a loading control. (F) Loss of TDRD3 reduces DHX9 recruitment to target gene promoters. ChIP assays were performed in WT and TDRD3 KO MCF7 cells using control IgG, αTDRD3, and αDHX9 antibodies. (G) Rescued expression of Flag-tagged WT and methylarginine binding-deficient (E691K) TDRD3 in TDRD3 KO MCF7 cells, detected by western blot analysis. (H) The methylarginine binding function of TDRD3 is essential for promoting DHX9 recruitment to the target gene promoters. DHX9 ChIP assays were performed in TDRD3 KO MCF7 cells and TDRD3 KO MCF7 cells re-expressing Flag-TDRD3 (WT) and Flag-TDRD3 (E691K). The relative enrichment of DHX9 in TDRD3 KO MCF7 cells was used for normalization. (I) DHX9 knockdown reduces TDRD3 target gene expression. MCF7 cells were transfected with either control siRNA (siControl) or DHX9-specific siRNA (siDHX9). The expression of TDRD3 target genes was detected by RT-qPCR assays. Experiments were performed independently for three times. Data are represented as mean ± standard deviation of three technical qPCR replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-tests. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
The TDRD3-DHX9 protein complex resolves promoter-associated R-loops. (A) Venn diagram of TDRD3 target genes and genes that form R-loops at their promoters, as identified by DRIPc-Seq (15). (B) TDRD3 knockout (KO) increases the R-loop levels at the promoters of its target genes. DRIP-qPCR analysis was performed to compare R-loop levels at the promoters of the TDRD3 target genes in wild type (WT) and TDRD3 KO MCF7 cells. Samples treated with RNase H, which disrupts R-loops, served as negative controls. (C) DHX9 knockdown does not affect TDRD3 protein expression. DHX9 and TDRD3 were detected by western blot analysis in MCF7 cells transfected with control siRNA (siControl) or DHX9-specific siRNA (siDHX9). ACTIN was used as a loading control. (D) DHX9 knockdown increases R-loop levels at the promoters of TDRD3 target genes. DRIP-qPCR analysis was performed to compare R-loop levels at the promoters of the TDRD3 target genes in control and DHX9 knockdown MCF7 cells. Samples treated with RNase H served as negative controls. (E) MCF7 cells were transfected with control siRNA (siControl) or DHX9-specific siRNA (siDHX9). After 24 h, the siDHX9-transfected cells were transfected with either an empty vector, WT DHX9 or helicase activity-deficient (K417R) DHX9 for an additional 48 h. DHX9 and TDRD3 were detected in these cells by western blot analysis. The anti-ACTIN was used as a loading control. (F) The helicase activity of DHX9 is essential for resolving R-loops at TDRD3 target gene promoters. DRIP-qPCR analysis was performed to compare R-loop levels at the promoters of the TDRD3 target genes in control (siControl) or DHX9 knockdown (siDHX9) MCF7 cells or DHX9 knockdown MCF7 cells with re-expression of either WT DHX9 (siDHX9 + WT) or helicase activity-deficient DHX9 (siDHX9 + K417R), as described in (E). Samples treated with RNase H served as negative controls. (G) TDRD3 KO and DHX9 knockdown cause RNAPII accumulation at gene promoters. RNAPII ChIP assays were performed in WT and TDRD3 KO, as well as control and DHX9 knockdown MCF7 cells. Normal rabbit IgG was used as a negative control. (H) Impact of TDRD3 KO and DHX9 knockdown on the nascent RNA transcription. Diagram demonstration of RHOB and RAD23A gene locus. The bars at the bottom of the diagrams indicate the amplicon locations for nascent RNA transcripts (red: promoter; blue: gene body and 3′end). Chromatin RNA immunoprecipitation was performed in WT and TDRD3 KO, as well as control and DHX9 knockdown MCF7 cells. The levels of nascent RNA were quantified by RT-qPCR. Experiments were performed independently three times. Data are represented as mean ± standard deviation of three technical qPCR replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-tests. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
TDRD3 promotes DHX9 helicase activity in R-loop resolution. (A) DHX9 resolves R-loops in a helicase activity-dependent manner. Coomassie Blue staining of recombinant wild type (WT) and helicase activity-deficient (K417R) DHX9 purified from HEK293 cells (left). The helicase assay on R-loops was performed by incubating increasing amounts of recombinant WT or K417R DHX9 with 5′ 6-FAM-labeled R-loop substrates (5 nM) at 37°C for 10 min. The reaction products were analyzed by gel electrophoresis and fluorescence imaging (right). The open triangle indicates the recombinant proteins. (B) TDRD3 stimulates the helicase activity of WT DHX9, but not K417R mutant DHX9, in R-loop resolution. Coomassie Blue staining of recombinant WT, K417R mutant DHX9, and TDRD3 purified from HEK293 cells (left). The helicase assay on R-loops was performed by incubating 5′ 6-FAM-labeled R-loop substrates with constant amounts of either WT or K417R mutant DHX9 (2 nM) and increasing amounts (40 and 60 nM) of TDRD3 (right). The open triangles indicate the recombinant proteins. (C) The OB-fold of TDRD3 binds single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). A graphic summary of the interactions of truncated TDRD3 fragments with ssDNA is shown (upper panel). Coomassie Blue staining of recombinant GST-fusion proteins of TDRD3, including its OB-fold, UBA domain, and Tudor domain, purified from E. coli (lower left panel). The electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) was performed by incubating a 5′ 6-FAM-labeled ssDNA oligonucleotide (5 nM) with increasing amounts (25 and 50 nM) of the recombinant TDRD3 proteins (lower right panel). The solid triangle indicates the protein–nucleotide complex. (D) The OB-fold is essential for the interaction of TDRD3 with ssDNA. A graphic summary of the WT, methylarginine binding-deficient (E691K), and OB-fold-truncated (ΔOB) TDRD3 interaction with ssDNA is shown (upper panel). Coomassie Blue staining of all three recombinant TDRD3 proteins purified from HEK293 cells (lower left panel). EMSA was performed to detect the binding of increasing amounts (20, 40 and 60 nM) of recombinant proteins with a 5′ 6-FAM-labeled ssDNA oligonucleotide (5 nM) (lower right panel). The open triangle indicates the recombinant proteins. The solid triangle indicates the protein-nucleotide complex. (E) TDRD3 interacts with R-loops, but not DNA/RNA hybrids. EMSA was performed by incubating increasing amounts (40 and 60 nM) of recombinant WT and OB-fold-truncated (ΔOB) TDRD3 with 5′ 6-FAM-labeled R-loop or DNA/RNA hybrid oligonucleotide (5 nM). The open triangle indicates the recombinant proteins. The solid triangle indicates the protein-nucleotide complex. (F) Both the OB-fold and the functional Tudor domain are required for TDRD3 to stimulate the helicase activity of DHX9 in R-loop resolution. The helicase assay on R-loops was performed by incubating 5′ 6-FAM-labeled R-loop substrates (5 nM) with a constant amount of DHX9 (2 nM) and increasing amounts (20, 40 and 60 nM) of WT, methylarginine binding-deficient (E691K), and ssDNA binding-deficient (ΔOB) TDRD3 (left). Helicase activity was quantified by measuring the percentage of unwound substrates under the indicated assay conditions (right). Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-tests of data from three independent experiments. *** P < 0.001.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
DHX9 and TOP3B function together to resolve co-transcriptional R-loops. (A) A ChIP-reChIP assay was performed to detect the co-occupancy of TDRD3 and TOP3B at target gene promoters. The first round of ChIP was performed using control IgG and αTDRD3 antibodies, and the second round of ChIP (reChIP) was performed using IgG and αTOP3B antibodies. ChIP DNA was analyzed by qPCR using primers for the indicated gene promoters. (B) Loss of TDRD3 reduces TOP3B recruitment to target gene promoters. ChIP assays were performed in WT and TDRD3 KO MCF7 cells using control IgG, αTDRD3, and αTOP3B antibodies. (C) MCF7 cells were transfected with control siRNA (siControl), DHX9-specific siRNA (siDHX9), or TOP3B-specific siRNA (siTOP3B), individually or in combination. TOP3B, DHX9 and TDRD3 were detected by western blot analysis using indicated antibodies. (D) TOP3B and DHX9 function together in resolving R-loops at TDRD3 target gene promoters. DRIP-qPCR analysis was performed to compare R-loop levels at the promoters of TDRD3 target genes in control (siControl), DHX9 knockdown (siDHX9), TOP3B knockdown (siTOP3B), and DHX9/TOP3B double knockdown (siDHX9 + siTOP3B) MCF7 cells. Samples treated with RNase H served as negative controls. (E) Schematic of the in vitro plasmid-based R-loop formation assay followed by quantification of R-loop levels using Dot-blot and DRIP-qPCR. pFC53 plasmids, which contain the R-loop-forming sequence of Airn (13), were transcribed in vitro using T3 RNA polymerase under standard conditions. The transcription products, including the DNA template, the free RNA product, and R-loop containing template, were then subjected to RNase A digestion to remove RNA. The remaining samples were equally divided and either left untreated (−) or treated with RNase H (+). The final products were purified and subjected to either Dot-blot analysis or DRIP-qPCR with DNA/RNA hybrid-specific antibody (S9.6) for R-loop quantification. (F) TOP3B and DHX9 function together to resolve co-transcriptional R-loops in vitro. The pFC53 plasmid was subjected to in vitro transcription in the presence of DHX9, WT TOP3B, and topoisomerase activity-deficient (Y336F) TOP3B, either individually or in combination, as indicated. The level of R-loops in each reaction was detected by Dot-Blot using the S9.6 antibody. The loading of the nucleic acid was visualized by methylene blue staining of the membrane. (G) TDRD3 functions as a scaffold that assembles a protein complex, containing TOP3B and DHX9, to regulate co-transcriptional R-loops at gene promoters. TDRD3 not only recruits TOP3B and DHX9 to specific genomic regions, but also stimulates their respective enzymatic activities to either resolve underwound DNA to prevent R-loop formation (with TOP3B) or resolve existing R-loops to avoid R-loop accumulation (with DHX9). This activity of TDRD3 is likely conferred by its interaction with ssDNA.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lee T.I., Young R.A.. Transcriptional regulation and its misregulation in disease. Cell. 2013; 152:1237–1251. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Soutourina J.Transcription regulation by the Mediator complex. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018; 19:262–274. - PubMed
    1. Duquette M.L., Handa P., Vincent J.A., Taylor A.F., Maizels N.. Intracellular transcription of G-rich DNAs induces formation of G-loops, novel structures containing G4 DNA. Genes Dev. 2004; 18:1618–1629. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Belotserkovskii B.P., De Silva E., Tornaletti S., Wang G., Vasquez K.M., Hanawalt P.C.. A triplex-forming sequence from the human c-MYC promoter interferes with DNA transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 2007; 282:32433–32441. - PubMed
    1. Tous C., Aguilera A.. Impairment of transcription elongation by R-loops in vitro. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007; 360:428–432. - PubMed

Publication types