Learning objectives (LO) are the foundation of a competency-based curriculum, but no studies assess how students use LO for exam preparation and/or their general attitudes toward LO. Therefore, the objectives were to evaluate how much veterinary students use LO to study, assess student attitudes toward simple and expanded LO, and determine if LO type impacts grade performance. An alternative-treatment design with pre-test and nonrandom groups was used. Veterinary students in the Endocrine Systems course in the 2019 spring (n = 89) and fall (n = 86) semesters were invited to participate and provided with simple and expanded LO, respectively. After an examination, participants completed an online survey before and after receiving their grade. Overall, 114 students (65%) responded. The percentage of students using simple versus expanded LO was not statistically different (χ2 = 1.874, df = 1, p = .171). Fifty-five students did not use LO; the majority (76.4%) preferred other study methods. Independent samples t-tests found no significant differences in student perceptions of helpfulness (t(30) = -1.118, p = .272), format (t(29) = 0.813, p = .423), or relevance (t(30) = 0.326, p = .747) between simple and expanded LO. Students agreed that LO were helpful (M = 3.33) and well formatted (M = 3.42) and that the provided information was relevant and detailed (M = 3.36). An ANOVA tested whether exam grade differed between students using simple versus expanded LO and for students who did not use LO; no significant differences were found (F(2,78) = .087, p = .917). In conclusion, students did not prefer more detailed LO and LO use did not impact grade performance.
Keywords: educational objectives; instructional objectives; intended learning outcomes; learning objectives; performance objectives; student attitudes; veterinary education.