Avapritinib Versus Regorafenib in Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic GI Stromal Tumor: A Randomized, Open-Label Phase III Study
- PMID: 34343033
- PMCID: PMC8478403
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.00217
Avapritinib Versus Regorafenib in Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic GI Stromal Tumor: A Randomized, Open-Label Phase III Study
Abstract
Purpose: Primary or secondary mutations in KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) underlie tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in most GI stromal tumors (GISTs). Avapritinib selectively and potently inhibits KIT- and PDGFRA-mutant kinases. In the phase I NAVIGATOR study (NCT02508532), avapritinib showed clinical activity against PDGFRA D842V-mutant and later-line KIT-mutant GIST. VOYAGER (NCT03465722), a phase III study, evaluated efficacy and safety of avapritinib versus regorafenib as third-line or later treatment in patients with unresectable or metastatic GIST.
Patients and methods: VOYAGER randomly assigned patients 1:1 to avapritinib 300 mg once daily (4 weeks continuously) or regorafenib 160 mg once daily (3 weeks on and 1 week off). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by central radiology per RECIST version 1.1 modified for GIST. Secondary end points included objective response rate, overall survival, safety, disease control rate, and duration of response. Regorafenib to avapritinib crossover was permitted upon centrally confirmed disease progression.
Results: Four hundred seventy-six patients were randomly assigned (avapritinib, n = 240; regorafenib, n = 236). Median PFS was not statistically different between avapritinib and regorafenib (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.57; 4.2 v 5.6 months; P = .055). Overall survival data were immature at cutoff. Objective response rates were 17.1% and 7.2%, with durations of responses of 7.6 and 9.4 months for avapritinib and regorafenib; disease control rates were 41.7% (95% CI, 35.4 to 48.2) and 46.2% (95% CI, 39.7 to 52.8). Treatment-related adverse events (any grade, grade ≥ 3) were similar for avapritinib (92.5% and 55.2%) and regorafenib (96.2% and 57.7%).
Conclusion: Primary end point was not met. There was no significant difference in median PFS between avapritinib and regorafenib in patients with molecularly unselected, late-line GIST.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Avapritinib in unresectable or metastatic PDGFRA D842V-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumours: Long-term efficacy and safety data from the NAVIGATOR phase I trial.Eur J Cancer. 2021 Mar;145:132-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.12.008. Epub 2021 Jan 16. Eur J Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33465704 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical efficacy comparison of avapritinib with other tyrosine kinase inhibitors in gastrointestinal stromal tumors with PDGFRA D842V mutation: a retrospective analysis of clinical trial and real-world data.BMC Cancer. 2021 Mar 19;21(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08013-1. BMC Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33740926 Free PMC article.
-
Avapritinib in advanced PDGFRA D842V-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumour (NAVIGATOR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jul;21(7):935-946. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30269-2. Lancet Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32615108 Clinical Trial.
-
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014 Oct;15(14):1979-89. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2014.937707. Epub 2014 Jul 3. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014. PMID: 24990162 Review.
-
Avapritinib in the treatment of PDGFRA exon 18 mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Future Oncol. 2020 Aug;16(22):1639-1646. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-0348. Epub 2020 Jun 10. Future Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32517495 Review.
Cited by
-
Deciphering the tumor immune microenvironment of imatinib-resistance in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors at single-cell resolution.Cell Death Dis. 2024 Mar 5;15(3):190. doi: 10.1038/s41419-024-06571-3. Cell Death Dis. 2024. PMID: 38443340 Free PMC article.
-
Recent advances in the systemic treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Cancer Biol Med. 2023 Oct 20;20(10):701-5. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2023.0302. Cancer Biol Med. 2023. PMID: 37874125 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Excessive concentrations of kinase inhibitors in translational studies impede effective drug repurposing.Cell Rep Med. 2023 Oct 17;4(10):101227. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101227. Cell Rep Med. 2023. PMID: 37852183 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Systemic Treatment Options for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 13;15(16):4081. doi: 10.3390/cancers15164081. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37627109 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the postimatinib era: A study based on the SEER database and a Chinese cohort.Cancer Med. 2023 Aug;12(15):15970-15982. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6240. Epub 2023 Jun 17. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 37329178 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Nilsson B, Bumming P, Meis-Kindblom JM, et al. : Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: The incidence, prevalence, clinical course, and prognostication in the preimatinib mesylate era--a population-based study in western Sweden. Cancer 103:821-829, 2005 - PubMed
-
- Soreide K, Sandvik OM, Soreide JA, et al. : Global epidemiology of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST): A systematic review of population-based cohort studies. Cancer Epidemiol 40:39-46, 2016 - PubMed
-
- Casali PG, Abecassis N, Aro HT, et al. : Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO-EURACAN clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 29:iv68-iv78, 2018 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
