Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Nov 1;6(11):1317-1323.
doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.2735.

Effect of Exercise Training on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Among Patients With Resistant Hypertension: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Exercise Training on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Among Patients With Resistant Hypertension: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Susana Lopes et al. JAMA Cardiol. .

Abstract

Importance: Limited evidence suggests exercise reduces blood pressure (BP) in individuals with resistant hypertension, a clinical population with low responsiveness to drug therapy.

Objective: To determine whether an aerobic exercise training intervention reduces ambulatory BP among patients with resistant hypertension.

Design, settings, and participants: The Exercise Training in the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension (EnRicH) trial is a prospective, 2-center, single-blinded randomized clinical trial performed at 2 hospital centers in Portugal from March 2017 to December 2019. A total of 60 patients with a diagnosis of resistant hypertension aged 40 to 75 years were prospectively enrolled and observed at the hospitals' hypertension outpatient clinic.

Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a 12-week moderate-intensity aerobic exercise training program (exercise group) or a usual care control group. The exercise group performed three 40-minute supervised sessions per week in addition to usual care.

Main outcomes and measures: The powered primary efficacy measure was 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP change from baseline. Secondary outcomes included daytime and nighttime ambulatory BP, office BP, and cardiorespiratory fitness.

Results: A total of 53 patients completed the study, including 26 in the exercise group and 27 in the control group. Of these, 24 (45%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 60.1 (8.7) years. Compared with the control group, among those in the exercise group, 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP was reduced by 7.1 mm Hg (95% CI, -12.8 to -1.4; P = .02). Additionally, 24-hour ambulatory diastolic BP (-5.1 mm Hg; 95% CI, -7.9 to -2.3; P = .001), daytime systolic BP (-8.4 mm Hg; 95% CI, -14.3 to -2.5; P = .006), and daytime diastolic BP (-5.7 mm Hg; 95% CI, -9.0 to -2.4; P = .001) were reduced in the exercise group compared with the control group. Office systolic BP (-10.0 mm Hg; 95% CI, -17.6 to -2.5; P = .01) and cardiorespiratory fitness (5.05 mL/kg per minute of oxygen consumption; 95% CI, 3.5 to 6.6; P < .001) also improved in the exercise group compared with the control group.

Conclusions and relevance: A 12-week aerobic exercise program reduced 24-hour and daytime ambulatory BP as well as office systolic BP in patients with resistant hypertension. These findings provide clinicians with evidence to embrace moderate-intensity aerobic exercise as a standard coadjutant therapy targeting this patient population.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03090529.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flow Diagram Depicting the Study Design
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Changes in Ambulatory and Office Blood Pressure (BP)
Change from baseline to the end of treatment in 24-hour and daytime ambulatory BP as well as office systolic and diastolic BP in the exercise and control groups. Significant changes from baseline to the end of the intervention in 24-hour, daytime, and office systolic and diastolic BP were observed in the exercise group compared with the control group. There was a significant between-group difference in favor of the exercise group for 24-hour and daytime ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP and for office systolic BP. Error bars indicate standard deviations.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carey RM, Calhoun DA, Bakris GL, et al. ; American Heart Association Professional/Public Education and Publications Committee of the Council on Hypertension; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Genomic and Precision Medicine; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research; and Stroke Council . Resistant hypertension: detection, evaluation, and management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2018;72(5):e53-e90. doi:10.1161/HYP.0000000000000084 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bakris GL, Townsend RR, Liu M, et al. ; SYMPLICITY HTN-3 Investigators . Impact of renal denervation on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure: results from SYMPLICITY HTN-3. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(11):1071-1078. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agasthi P, Shipman J, Arsanjani R, et al. . Renal denervation for resistant hypertension in the contemporary era: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):6200. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42695-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhatt DL, Kandzari DE, O’Neill WW, et al. ; SYMPLICITY HTN-3 Investigators . A controlled trial of renal denervation for resistant hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(15):1393-1401. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1402670 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gierthmuehlen M, Plachta DTT, Zentner J. Implant-mediated therapy of arterial hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2020;22(2):16. doi:10.1007/s11906-020-1019-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data