Milrinone as Compared with Dobutamine in the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock
- PMID: 34347952
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2026845
Milrinone as Compared with Dobutamine in the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock
Abstract
Background: Cardiogenic shock is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Although inotropic support is a mainstay of medical therapy for cardiogenic shock, little evidence exists to guide the selection of inotropic agents in clinical practice.
Methods: We randomly assigned patients with cardiogenic shock to receive milrinone or dobutamine in a double-blind fashion. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital death from any cause, resuscitated cardiac arrest, receipt of a cardiac transplant or mechanical circulatory support, nonfatal myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack or stroke diagnosed by a neurologist, or initiation of renal replacement therapy. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary composite outcome.
Results: A total of 192 participants (96 in each group) were enrolled. The treatment groups did not differ significantly with respect to the primary outcome; a primary outcome event occurred in 47 participants (49%) in the milrinone group and in 52 participants (54%) in the dobutamine group (relative risk, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 1.19; P = 0.47). There were also no significant differences between the groups with respect to secondary outcomes, including in-hospital death (37% and 43% of the participants, respectively; relative risk, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.21), resuscitated cardiac arrest (7% and 9%; hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.29 to 2.07), receipt of mechanical circulatory support (12% and 15%; hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.71), or initiation of renal replacement therapy (22% and 17%; hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.73 to 2.67).
Conclusions: In patients with cardiogenic shock, no significant difference between milrinone and dobutamine was found with respect to the primary composite outcome or important secondary outcomes. (Funded by the Innovation Fund of the Alternative Funding Plan for the Academic Health Sciences Centres of Ontario; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03207165.).
Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Comment in
-
Milrinone as Compared with Dobutamine in the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock.N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 25;385(22):2107-2108. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2114890. N Engl J Med. 2021. PMID: 34818493 No abstract available.
-
Milrinone as Compared with Dobutamine in the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock.N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 25;385(22):2108. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2114890. N Engl J Med. 2021. PMID: 34818494 No abstract available.
-
Cardiogenic Shock: Insights from Recent Randomized Clinical Trials.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 May 15;209(10):1255-1257. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202303-0604RR. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024. PMID: 38498852 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Impact of baseline beta-blocker use on inotrope response and clinical outcomes in cardiogenic shock: a subgroup analysis of the DOREMI trial.Crit Care. 2021 Aug 10;25(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03706-2. Crit Care. 2021. PMID: 34376218 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
No sex-based difference in cardiogenic shock: A post-hoc analysis of the DOREMI trial.J Cardiol. 2022 Oct;80(4):358-364. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.06.001. Epub 2022 Jun 17. J Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 35725945 Clinical Trial.
-
Milrinone vs Dobutamine for the Management of Cardiogenic Shock: Implications of Renal Function and Injury.JACC Adv. 2023 Jul 5;2(5):100393. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100393. eCollection 2023 Jul. JACC Adv. 2023. PMID: 38938997 Free PMC article.
-
Meta-analysis Comparing the Efficacy of Dobutamine Versus Milrinone in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock.Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023 Aug;48(8):101245. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101245. Epub 2022 May 8. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 35545181 Review.
-
Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 29;1(1):CD009669. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009669.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 5;11:CD009669. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009669.pub4 PMID: 29376560 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
Management of cardiogenic shock: state-of-the-art.Intensive Care Med. 2024 Nov;50(11):1814-1829. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07618-x. Epub 2024 Sep 10. Intensive Care Med. 2024. PMID: 39254735 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Review of Advancements in Managing Cardiogenic Shock: From Emergency Care Protocols to Long-Term Therapeutic Strategies.J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 16;13(16):4841. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164841. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39200983 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Management of Post-Myocardial Infarction Right Ventricular Failure.J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Nov 26;2(1):100526. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100526. eCollection 2023 Jan-Feb. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022. PMID: 39132546 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Resource Utilization and Costs Associated With Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Myocardial Infarction: A Population-Based Cohort Study.JACC Adv. 2024 Jul 2;3(8):101047. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101047. eCollection 2024 Aug. JACC Adv. 2024. PMID: 39050814 Free PMC article.
-
Dobutamine in the Management of Advanced Heart Failure.J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 27;13(13):3782. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133782. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38999346 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources