Intergroup preference, not dehumanization, explains social biases in emotion attribution

Cognition. 2021 Nov:216:104865. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104865. Epub 2021 Aug 3.

Abstract

Psychological models can only help improve intergroup relations if they accurately characterise the mechanisms underlying social biases. The claim that outgroups suffer dehumanization is near ubiquitous in the social sciences. We challenge the most prominent psychological model of dehumanization - infrahumanization theory - which holds outgroup members are subtly dehumanized by being denied human emotions. We examine the theory across seven intergroup contexts in thirteen pre-registered and highly powered experiments (N = 1690). We find outgroup members are not denied uniquely human emotions relative to ingroup members. Rather, they are ascribed prosocial emotions to a lesser extent but antisocial emotions to a greater extent. Apparent evidence for infrahumanization is better explained by ingroup preference, outgroup derogation and stereotyping. Infrahumanization theory may obscure more than it reveals about intergroup bias.

Keywords: Dehumanization; Infrahumanization; Intergroup bias; Prejudice; Social cognition.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Bias
  • Dehumanization*
  • Emotions*
  • Group Processes
  • Humans
  • Social Identification
  • Social Perception