Effect of Intravenous Fluid Treatment With a Balanced Solution vs 0.9% Saline Solution on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: The BaSICS Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 34375394
- PMCID: PMC8356144
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.11684
Effect of Intravenous Fluid Treatment With a Balanced Solution vs 0.9% Saline Solution on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: The BaSICS Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Importance: Intravenous fluids are used for almost all intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Clinical and laboratory studies have questioned whether specific fluid types result in improved outcomes, including mortality and acute kidney injury.
Objective: To determine the effect of a balanced solution vs saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride) on 90-day survival in critically ill patients.
Design, setting, and participants: Double-blind, factorial, randomized clinical trial conducted at 75 ICUs in Brazil. Patients who were admitted to the ICU with at least 1 risk factor for worse outcomes, who required at least 1 fluid expansion, and who were expected to remain in the ICU for more than 24 hours were randomized between May 29, 2017, and March 2, 2020; follow-up concluded on October 29, 2020. Patients were randomized to 2 different fluid types (a balanced solution vs saline solution reported in this article) and 2 different infusion rates (reported separately).
Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either a balanced solution (n = 5522) or 0.9% saline solution (n = 5530) for all intravenous fluids.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was 90-day survival.
Results: Among 11 052 patients who were randomized, 10 520 (95.2%) were available for the analysis (mean age, 61.1 [SD, 17] years; 44.2% were women). There was no significant interaction between the 2 interventions (fluid type and infusion speed; P = .98). Planned surgical admissions represented 48.4% of all patients. Of all the patients, 60.6% had hypotension or vasopressor use and 44.3% required mechanical ventilation at enrollment. Patients in both groups received a median of 1.5 L of fluid during the first day after enrollment. By day 90, 1381 of 5230 patients (26.4%) assigned to a balanced solution died vs 1439 of 5290 patients (27.2%) assigned to saline solution (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.90-1.05]; P = .47). There were no unexpected treatment-related severe adverse events in either group.
Conclusion and relevance: Among critically ill patients requiring fluid challenges, use of a balanced solution compared with 0.9% saline solution did not significantly reduce 90-day mortality. The findings do not support the use of this balanced solution.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02875873.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
- doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.11119
Similar articles
-
Effect of Slower vs Faster Intravenous Fluid Bolus Rates on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: The BaSICS Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2021 Sep 7;326(9):830-838. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.11444. JAMA. 2021. PMID: 34547081 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Study protocol for the Balanced Solution versus Saline in Intensive Care Study (BaSICS): a factorial randomised trial.Crit Care Resusc. 2017 Jun;19(2):175-182. Crit Care Resusc. 2017. PMID: 28651514 Clinical Trial.
-
Balanced crystalloids versus saline in the intensive care unit: study protocol for a cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial.Trials. 2017 Mar 16;18(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1871-1. Trials. 2017. PMID: 28302179 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Balanced crystalloids versus isotonic saline in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.J Intensive Care. 2018 Aug 17;6:51. doi: 10.1186/s40560-018-0320-x. eCollection 2018. J Intensive Care. 2018. PMID: 30140441 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Balanced crystalloid solutions versus normal saline in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Nov;55(11):2829-2844. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03570-9. Epub 2023 Apr 5. Int Urol Nephrol. 2023. PMID: 37017820 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Ringer's lactate administered at 15 °C leads to a greater and more prolonged increase in blood pressure compared to 37 °C.Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 26;14(1):25592. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76858-0. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39462030 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Volume therapy: which preparation for which situation?].Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2024 Nov;119(8):640-649. doi: 10.1007/s00063-024-01194-0. Epub 2024 Oct 9. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2024. PMID: 39382683 Free PMC article. Review. German.
-
The Precision Resuscitation With Crystalloids in Sepsis (PRECISE) Trial: A Trial Protocol.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2434197. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.34197. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39292459 Free PMC article.
-
Reimagining critical care: Trends and shifts in 21st century medicine.World J Crit Care Med. 2024 Sep 9;13(3):94020. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i3.94020. eCollection 2024 Sep 9. World J Crit Care Med. 2024. PMID: 39253310 Free PMC article.
-
Agreement Between Mega-Trials and Smaller Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Research Analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2432296. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32296. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39240561 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Finfer S, Myburgh J, Bellomo R. Intravenous fluid therapy in critically ill adults. Published correction appears in Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14(11):717. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14(9):541-557. - PubMed
-
- Yunos NM, Bellomo R, Hegarty C, et al. . Association between a chloride-liberal vs chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults. JAMA. 2012;308(15):1566-1572. - PubMed
-
- Raghunathan K, Shaw A, Nathanson B, et al. . Association between the choice of IV crystalloid and in-hospital mortality among critically ill adults with sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(7):1585-1591. - PubMed
-
- Zampieri FG, Ranzani OT, Azevedo LC, et al. . Lactated ringer is associated with reduced mortality and less acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort analysis. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(12):2163-2170. - PubMed
