Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;25(2):214-224.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980021002950. Epub 2021 Aug 19.

Social inequality in food consumption between 2008 and 2019 in Brazil

Affiliations

Social inequality in food consumption between 2008 and 2019 in Brazil

Barbara Virginia Caixeta Crepaldi et al. Public Health Nutr. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To analyse the trend of social inequality in food consumption among Brazilians from 2008 to 2019.

Design: Time series analyses using cross-sectional annual data from the Telephone Surveillance System (VIGITEL 2008-2019). Food consumption was evaluated through: (1) consumption of five or more portions of fruits and vegetables in ≥5 d/week; (2) consumption of beans in ≥5 d/week and (3) consumption of soft drinks or artificial juices in ≥5 d/week. Absolute inequality was assessed by the slope index of inequality (SII) and relative inequality by the concentration index (CIX). SII and CIX positive values indicate higher prevalence among more educated citizens and negative among less educated ones. Time trend was assessed by linear regression using weighted least squares.

Setting: 26 Brazilian state capitals and the Federal District.

Participants: 621 689 individuals ≥18 years.

Results: Fruits and vegetable consumption was more prevalent among the more educated citizens, while beans were mostly consumed by the less educated, and soft drinks or artificial juices was more prevalent among individuals with intermediate education. The highest absolute inequality was found for beans (SII2019 -25·9). In 12 years, the absolute inequality increased for fruit and vegetable consumption (from SII2008 12·8 to SII2019 16·2), remained for beans (SII2008 -23·1 to SII2019 -25·9) and reduced for soft drinks or artificial juices (SII2008 8·7 to SII2019 0·4). Relative inequality was low and constant.

Conclusion: Despite the advances reducing inequalities in soft drinks or artificial juice consumption, the increase in the social gap for adequate consumption of fruits and vegetables is troublesome.

Keywords: Education; Food consumption; Foods; Inequality; Surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consumption prevalence of fruits and vegetables, beans and soft drinks or artificial juices in Brazil, by years of education and survey year, VIGITEL 2008–2019 (equiplot). VIGITEL, Surveillance of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases through Telephone Interviews. *Food consumption of 5 or more servings per day in 5 or more days of the week. Food consumption in 5 or more days of the week. Lack of an available indicator in 2018. formula image, 0–3; formula image, 4–8; formula image, 9–11; formula image, ≥ 12
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Trends in the predicted slope index of educational inequality (SII) and predicted concentration index of educational inequality (CIX) for consumption prevalence of fruits and vegetables (a; b), beans (c; d) soft drinks or artificial juices (e; f) in Brazil, by sex and skin colour/race, VIGITEL 2008–2019. VIGITEL, Surveillance of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases through Telephone Interviews. *Food consumption of 5 or more servings per day in 5 or more days of the week. Food consumption in 5 or more days of the week. § P < 0·05 (P-trend). formula image, total; formula image, female; formula image, male; formula image, White; formula image, Black/Brown
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Consumption prevalence of fruits and vegetables, beans and soft drinks or artificial juices in Brazil, by sex and skin colour/race and the slope index of educational inequality (SII) (a) and concentration index of educational inequality (CIX) (b), VIGITEL 2019. VIGITEL, Surveillance of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases through Telephone Interviews. *Food consumption of 5 or more servings per day in 5 or more days of the week. Food consumption in 5 or more days of the week. formula image, total; formula image, female; formula image, male; formula image, White; formula image, Black/Brown

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization (2020) Healthy diet. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/healthy-diet (accessed August 2020).
    1. Miller V, Mente A, Dehghan M et al. (2017) Fruit, vegetable, and legume intake, and cardiovascular disease and deaths in 18 countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study. Lancet 390, 2037–2049. - PubMed
    1. Pagliai G, Dinu M, Madarena MP et al. (2021) Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr 125, 308–318. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canuto R, Fanton M & Lira PICd (2019) Social inequities in food consumption in Brazil: a critical review of the national surveys. Cien Saude Colet 24, 3193–3212. - PubMed
    1. Mayén A-L, Marques-Vidal P, Paccaud F et al. (2014) Socioeconomic determinants of dietary patterns in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 100, 1520–1531. - PubMed

Publication types