[Variation Characteristics and Source Analysis of Carbonaceous Aerosols in Winter in Jiashan]

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2021 Sep 8;42(9):4116-4125. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202101167.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon (EC), and PM2.5 concentration data obtained from Shanxi Super Station in Jiashan County of Jiaxing City, in the winter of 2018 and 2019, were analyzed to determine the variation and potential source areas of carbonaceous aerosols. The results show that OC concentrations in the winter of 2018 and 2019 were 6.90 μg·m-3 and 5.63 μg·m-3, respectively, while EC concentrations were 2.47 μg·m-3 and 1.57 μg·m-3, respectively. The concentrations of OC and EC in the winter of 2019 were lower than those in the winter of 2018, by approximately 18.4% and 36.4%, respectively. In 2018 and 2019, the concentrations of secondary organic carbon (SOC), calculated using the minimum R-squared (MRS) method, were 1.49 μg·m-3 and 1.97 μg·m-3, respectively, and the concentrations of primary organic carbon (POC) were 5.41 μg·m-3 and 3.66 μg·m-3, respectively. The proportion of POC in OC showed a downward trend, from 96.0% in December 2018 to 64.9% in February 2020, indicating a decrease of 31.1 percentage points. SOC showed an upward trend, increasing by 31.1 percentage points from 4.0% in December 2018 to 35.1% in February 2020. It is worth noting that with the increase in PM2.5 concentration, the concentration of OC and EC increased by 474.7% and 408.2%, respectively, although the proportion of OC in PM2.5 decreased from 18.8% to 12.3%. and the percentage of OC decreased from 5.8% to 3.3%. The contribution of POC to PM2.5 did not fluctuate, and only decreased significantly above 150 μg·m-3, while the contribution of SOC to PM2.5 first decreased and then increased. In Jiaxing, the potential sources of OC and EC were mainly southern Jiangsu, southeastern Anhui, local Jiaxing, and northern Zhejiang. In the winter of the contribution concentrations of OC and EC in the main potential source regions were approximately 2 μg·m-3 and 6 μg·m-3 lower, respectively, than in winter 2018. The range of high values in the potential source regions also decreased in 2019. Before the COVID-19 epidemic, it was affected by both motor vehicle exhaust emissions and coal burning. During the Spring Festival and home isolation, due to traffic control and other reasons, motor vehicle emissions were reduced, which leaving coal burning as the main contributor.

Keywords: MRS method; carbonaceous aerosol; lockdown; potential source region; secondary organic carbon.

MeSH terms

  • Aerosols / analysis
  • Air Pollutants* / analysis
  • COVID-19*
  • Environmental Monitoring
  • Humans
  • Particulate Matter / analysis
  • SARS-CoV-2

Substances

  • Aerosols
  • Air Pollutants
  • Particulate Matter