Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Aug 4;19(8):448.
doi: 10.3390/md19080448.

A Soft Spot for Chemistry-Current Taxonomic and Evolutionary Implications of Sponge Secondary Metabolite Distribution

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

A Soft Spot for Chemistry-Current Taxonomic and Evolutionary Implications of Sponge Secondary Metabolite Distribution

Adrian Galitz et al. Mar Drugs. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Marine sponges are the most prolific marine sources for discovery of novel bioactive compounds. Sponge secondary metabolites are sought-after for their potential in pharmaceutical applications, and in the past, they were also used as taxonomic markers alongside the difficult and homoplasy-prone sponge morphology for species delineation (chemotaxonomy). The understanding of phylogenetic distribution and distinctiveness of metabolites to sponge lineages is pivotal to reveal pathways and evolution of compound production in sponges. This benefits the discovery rate and yield of bioprospecting for novel marine natural products by identifying lineages with high potential of being new sources of valuable sponge compounds. In this review, we summarize the current biochemical data on sponges and compare the metabolite distribution against a sponge phylogeny. We assess compound specificity to lineages, potential convergences, and suitability as diagnostic phylogenetic markers. Our study finds compound distribution corroborating current (molecular) phylogenetic hypotheses, which include yet unaccepted polyphyly of several demosponge orders and families. Likewise, several compounds and compound groups display a high degree of lineage specificity, which suggests homologous biosynthetic pathways among their taxa, which identifies yet unstudied species of this lineage as promising bioprospecting targets.

Keywords: bioactivity; chemotaxonomy; marine sponge; natural product evolution; secondary metabolite.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Phylogenetic distribution of bioactive sponge compounds. Taxa were chosen from a comprehensive list of metabolite-bearing sponge species, independent of their taxon specificity, and were supplemented with further taxa from the respective molecular tree sources where applicable. Colors do not depict relatedness of compounds and were solely chosen for better contrast between different compound classes. Dashed lines indicate reports of compounds suggested for verification. Genus and species names have been adopted from the respective source publications. Particularly for taxa that still await revision, higher-level classification (as given on the branches) might be in conflict with the current reference (World Porifera Database). See text for details.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Phylogenetic distribution of bioactive sponge compounds. Taxa were chosen from a comprehensive list of metabolite-bearing sponge species, independent of their taxon specificity, and were supplemented with further taxa from the respective molecular tree sources where applicable. Colors do not depict relatedness of compounds and were solely chosen for better contrast between different compound classes. Dashed lines indicate reports of compounds suggested for verification. Genus and species names have been adopted from the respective source publications. Particularly for taxa that still await revision, higher-level classification (as given on the branches) might be in conflict with the current reference (World Porifera Database). See text for details.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Phylogenetic distribution of bioactive sponge compounds. Taxa were chosen from a comprehensive list of metabolite-bearing sponge species, independent of their taxon specificity, and were supplemented with further taxa from the respective molecular tree sources where applicable. Colors do not depict relatedness of compounds and were solely chosen for better contrast between different compound classes. Dashed lines indicate reports of compounds suggested for verification. Genus and species names have been adopted from the respective source publications. Particularly for taxa that still await revision, higher-level classification (as given on the branches) might be in conflict with the current reference (World Porifera Database). See text for details.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Selection of exemplary sponge-derived secondary metabolites with potential for taxon specificity. The value and validity of the investigated compound groups are discussed in their respective sections of the text.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Further exemplary sponge-derived secondary metabolites with potential for taxon specificity. The value and validity of the investigated compound groups is discussed in their respective sections of the text.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gehling J.G., Rigby J.K. Long Expected Sponges from the Neoproterozoic Ediacara Fauna of South Australia. J. Paleontol. 1996;70:185–195. doi: 10.1017/S0022336000023283. - DOI
    1. Sperling E.A., Robinson J.M., Pisani D., Peterson K.J. Where’s the Glass? Biomarkers, Molecular Clocks, and microRNAs Suggest a 200-Myr Missing Precambrian Fossil Record of Siliceous Sponge Spicules. Geobiology. 2010;8:24–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2009.00225.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schuster A., Vargas S., Knapp I.S., Pomponi S.A., Toonen R.J., Erpenbeck D., Wörheide G. Divergence Times in Demosponges (Porifera): First Insights from New Mitogenomes and the Inclusion of Fossils in a Birth-Death Clock Model. BMC Evol. Biol. 2018;18:114. doi: 10.1186/s12862-018-1230-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Soest R.W.M., Boury-Esnault N., Hooper J.N.A., Rützler K., de Voogd N.J., Alvarez B., Hajdu E., Pisera A.B., Manconi R., Schönberg C., et al. World Porifera Database. The World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) [(accessed on 12 June 2021)];2021 Available online: http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera.
    1. Manconi R., Pronzato R. Global Diversity of Sponges (Porifera: Spongillina) in Freshwater. Hydrobiologia. 2008;595:27–33. doi: 10.1007/s10750-007-9000-x. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources