Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging after first-line coronary computed tomography angiography: A multi-center cohort study
- PMID: 34475016
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2021.08.001
Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging after first-line coronary computed tomography angiography: A multi-center cohort study
Abstract
Purpose: Further diagnostic testing may be required after a coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) showing suspected coronary stenosis. Whether myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) provides further prognostic information post-CTA remains debated. We evaluated the prognosis for patients completing CTA stratified for post-CTA diagnostic work-up using real-world data.
Methods: We identified all patients in our uptake area with angina symptoms undergoing first-time CTA over a 10-year period. Follow-up time was a median of 3.7 years [1.9-5.8]. The primary endpoint was a composite of myocardial infarction or death. The secondary endpoint was late revascularization.
Results: During the study period 53,351 patients underwent CTA. Of these, 24% were referred for further down-stream testing, 3,547 (7%) to MPI and 9,135 (17%) to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). The primary and secondary endpoints occurred in 2,026 (3.8%) and 954 (1.8%) patients. Patient-characteristic-adjusted hazard ratios for the primary and secondary endpoint using patients with a normal CTA as reference were 1.37 (1.21-1.55) and 2.50 (1.93-3.23) for patient treated medically, 1.68 (1.39-2.03) and 6.13 (4.58-8.21) for patients referred to MPI and 1.94 (1.69-2.23) and 9.18 (7.16-11.78) for patients referred for ICA, respectively. Adjusted analysis with stratification for disease severity at CTA showed similar hazard ratios for patients treated medically after CTA and patients referred for MPI and treated medically after the MPI.
Conclusion: In patients completing coronary CTA, second-line MPI testing seems to identify patients at low risk of future events. MPI seems to have the potential to act as gatekeeper for ICA after coronary CTA.
Keywords: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR); Coronary stenosis; Hybrid imaging; Positron emission tomography (PET); Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).
Copyright © 2021 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors have no disclosures related to this project, but report the following general disclosures: S. Winther and M Bøttcher acknowledges support from Acarix in the form of an institutional research grant. M Bøttcher discloses advisory board participation for NOVO Nordisk, Astra-Zeneca, Bayer, Sanofi and Acarix. ELG has received speaker honoraria or consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, MSD, Portola Pharmaceuticals and Roche and research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Randomized Comparison of Clinical Effectiveness of Pharmacologic SPECT and PET MPI in Symptomatic CAD Patients.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Sep;12(9):1821-1831. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 Jul 17. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019. PMID: 31326480 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Contemporary Discrepancies of Stenosis Assessment by Computed Tomography and Invasive Coronary Angiography.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Feb;12(2):e007720. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.007720. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019. PMID: 30764641
-
Feasibility of combined risk stratification with coronary CT angiography and stress myocardial SPECT in patients with chronic coronary artery disease.Ann Nucl Med. 2018 Jan;32(1):22-33. doi: 10.1007/s12149-017-1214-z. Epub 2017 Oct 6. Ann Nucl Med. 2018. PMID: 28986773
-
CT Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion and Fractional Flow Reserve.Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 May-Jun;57(6):623-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 12. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015. PMID: 25770850 Review.
-
SPECT/PET myocardial perfusion imaging versus coronary CT angiography in patients with known or suspected CAD.Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010 Apr;54(2):177-200. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010. PMID: 20592682 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of prognosis between coronary computed tomography angiography versus invasive coronary angiography for stable coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 May 5;10:1010536. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1010536. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 37215543 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
