Objective: Sensitivity is often an issue in bioanalytical LC-MS/MS applications. Commonly investigated parameters to improve it include additives to mobile phase, derivatization and sample-preparation. The nature of the column, however, is not frequently evaluated.
Design and methods: The sensitivity is compared for 18 different reversed phase and 2 different HILIC columns using 2 different mobile phase compositions. Sensitivity was evaluated in terms of S/N for 1,5 pg oxytocin on column, using a scouting gradient.
Results: The measured signal to noise ranged from 55 to 1473, indicating a substantial difference in sensitivity. The most sensitive columns were the Synergi Hydro RP (reversed phase) and the Atlantis HILIC (HILIC).
Conclusions: This study shows that choosing the right column contributes to the sensitivity of the method.
Keywords: HILIC; Liquid chromatography; Oxytocin; Reversed phase.
© 2021 The Author.