Randomized Controlled Trial of a Dichoptic Digital Therapeutic for Amblyopia
- PMID: 34534556
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.09.001
Randomized Controlled Trial of a Dichoptic Digital Therapeutic for Amblyopia
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum.Ophthalmology. 2022 May;129(5):593. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.02.012. Ophthalmology. 2022. PMID: 35461530 No abstract available.
Abstract
Purpose: Digital therapeutics are a new class of interventions that are software driven and are intended to treat various conditions. We developed and evaluated a dichoptic digital therapeutic for amblyopia, a neurodevelopmental disorder for which current treatments may be limited by poor adherence and residual vision deficits.
Design: Randomized controlled trial.
Participants: One hundred five children 4 to 7 years of age with amblyopia were enrolled at 21 academic and community sites in the United States. Participants were randomized 1:1 to the treatment or comparison group, stratified by site.
Methods: We conducted a phase 3 randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a dichoptic digital therapeutic for amblyopia. Participants in the treatment group used the therapeutic at home for 1 hour per day, 6 days per week and wore glasses full-time. Participants in the comparison group continued wearing glasses full-time alone.
Main outcome measures: The primary efficacy outcome was change in amblyopic eye visual acuity (VA) from baseline at 12 weeks, and VA was measured by masked examiners. Safety was evaluated using the frequency and severity of study-related adverse events. Primary analyses were conducted using the intention-to-treat population.
Results: Between January 16, 2019, and January 15, 2020, 105 participants were enrolled; 51 were randomized to the treatment group and 54 were randomized to the comparison group. At 12 weeks, amblyopic eye VA improved by 1.8 lines (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-2.3 lines; n = 45) in the treatment group and by 0.8 lines (95% CI, 0.4-1.3 lines; n = 45) in the comparison group. At the planned interim analysis (adjusted α = 0.0193), the difference between groups was significant (1.0 lines; P = 0.0011; 96.14% CI, 0.33-1.63 lines) and the study was stopped early for success, according to the protocol. No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusions: Our findings support the value of the therapeutic in clinical practice as an effective treatment. Future studies should evaluate the therapeutic compared with other methods and in additional patient populations.
Keywords: Amblyopia; Digital therapeutic; Lazy eye; Treatment.
Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Answers and Questions about the Digital Dichoptic Treatment of Amblyopia.Ophthalmology. 2022 Jan;129(1):86. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.08.015. Ophthalmology. 2022. PMID: 34930552 No abstract available.
-
Re: Xiao et al.: Randomized controlled trial of a dichoptic digital therapeutic for amblyopia (Ophthalmology. 2022;129:77-85).Ophthalmology. 2022 Oct;129(10):e151-e152. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.06.015. Epub 2022 Jul 19. Ophthalmology. 2022. PMID: 35868878 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effect of a Binocular iPad Game vs Part-time Patching in Children Aged 5 to 12 Years With Amblyopia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec 1;134(12):1391-1400. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4262. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 27812703 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A Randomized Trial of Binocular Dig Rush Game Treatment for Amblyopia in Children Aged 7 to 12 Years.Ophthalmology. 2019 Mar;126(3):456-466. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.10.032. Epub 2018 Oct 22. Ophthalmology. 2019. PMID: 30352226 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Developmental vision disorders: Do children and adolescents benefit from active vision training? IQWiG Reports – Commission No. HT21-03 [Internet].Cologne (Germany): Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG); 2023 Jul 25. Cologne (Germany): Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG); 2023 Jul 25. PMID: 37878737 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
A Randomized Trial of Binocular Dig Rush Game Treatment for Amblyopia in Children Aged 4 to 6 Years.Optom Vis Sci. 2022 Mar 1;99(3):213-227. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001867. Optom Vis Sci. 2022. PMID: 35086119 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 11;2015(8):CD011347. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011347.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 7;2:CD011347. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011347.pub3. PMID: 26263202 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of monocular and binocular contrast perception on virtual reality head-mounted displays.J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2024 Nov;11(6):062605. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.11.6.062605. Epub 2024 Sep 14. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2024. PMID: 39280782
-
Amblyopia Preferred Practice Pattern.Ophthalmology. 2023 Mar;130(3):P136-P178. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.11.003. Epub 2022 Dec 14. Ophthalmology. 2023. PMID: 36526450 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Contrast Sensitivity and Stereoacuity in Successfully Treated Refractive Amblyopia.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022 Jan 3;63(1):6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.63.1.6. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022. PMID: 34989762 Free PMC article.
-
Issues Revisited: Shifts in Binocular Balance Depend on the Deprivation Duration in Normal and Amblyopic Adults.Ophthalmol Ther. 2022 Dec;11(6):2027-2044. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00560-5. Epub 2022 Aug 25. Ophthalmol Ther. 2022. PMID: 36008603 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of Amblyopia Treatments in Children Up to Seven Years Old: A Systematic Review.Cureus. 2024 Mar 22;16(3):e56705. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56705. eCollection 2024 Mar. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38650802 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
