Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Feb 1;150(3):461-471.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.33812. Epub 2021 Sep 25.

Clinical validation of p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology triage of HPV-positive women: Results from the IMPACT trial

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Observational Study

Clinical validation of p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology triage of HPV-positive women: Results from the IMPACT trial

Thomas C Wright Jr et al. Int J Cancer. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Triage strategies are needed for primary human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical cancer screening to identify women requiring colposcopy/biopsy. We assessed the performance of p16/Ki-67 dual-stained (DS) immunocytochemistry to triage HPV-positive women and compared it to cytology, with or without HPV16/18 genotyping. A prospective observational screening study enrolled 35 263 women aged 25 to 65 years at 32 U.S. sites. Cervical samples had HPV and cytology testing, with colposcopy/biopsy for women with positive tests. Women without cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Grade 2 or worse (≥CIN2) at baseline (n = 3876) were retested after 1 year. In all, 4927 HPV-positive women with valid DS results were included in this analysis. DS sensitivity for ≥CIN2 and ≥CIN3 at baseline was 91.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.8%-94.2%) and 91.9% (95% CI: 86.1%-95.4%), respectively, in HPV16/18-positive women and 83.0% (95% CI: 78.4%-86.8%) and 86.0% (95% CI: 77.5%-91.6%) in women with 12 "other" genotypes. Using DS alone to triage HPV-positive women showed significantly higher sensitivity and specificity than HPV16/18 genotyping with cytology triage of 12 "other" genotypes, and substantially higher sensitivity but lower specificity than using cytology alone. The risk of ≥CIN2 was significantly lower in HPV-positive, DS-negative women (3.6%; 95% CI: 2.9%-4.4%), compared to triage-negative women using HPV16/18 genotyping with cytology for 12 "other" genotypes (7.4%; 95% CI: 6.4%-8.5%; P < .0001) or cytology alone (7.5%; 95% CI: 6.7%-8.4%; P < .0001). DS showed better risk stratification than cytology-based strategies and provided high reassurance against pre-cancers both at baseline and at 1-year follow-up, irrespective of the HPV genotype. DS allows for the safe triage of primary screening HPV-positive women.

Keywords: HPV testing; cervical cancer; p16/Ki-67 dual-stain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Drs. Stoler and Wright are consultants to Roche, BD Life Sciences, Inovio, and QSquared Solutions. They are speakers for Roche and BD Life Sciences. The other authors are employees of Roche.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
CONSORT diagram. Triage of cobas 6800/8800 HPV‐positive women. There were 481 (DS positive), 535 (DS negative) and 77 (DS unsatisfactory) cases with no baseline CPR results, which made them eligible to be referred to the 1 year follow‐up phase. Among them, there were 20, 30 and 7 cases in the DS positive, DS negative and DS unsatisfactory categories, respectively, which had valid 1‐year CPR results. ACIS, adenocarcinoma in situ; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; CPR, central pathology review; DS, dual stain; NILM, negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Risk of ≥CIN3 in cobas 6800/8800 HPV‐positive women dependent on HPV genotype group, cytology and dual‐stain results. Cumulative 1‐year risks of ≥CIN3 for HPV genotype groups (16/18+; 12 other+), cytology (NILM, ≥ASC‐US) and dual‐stain (DS+, DS−) test results are plotted on the y‐axis, with the number of subjects within the respective categories indicated

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wright TC, Stoler MH, Behrens CM, Sharma A, Zhang G, Wright TL. Primary cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus: end of study results from the ATHENA study using HPV as the first‐line screening test. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;136:189‐197. - PubMed
    1. Stoler MH, Wright TC Jr, Parvu V, et al. The onclarity human papillomavirus trial: design, methods, and baseline results. Gynecol Oncol. 2018;149:498‐505. - PubMed
    1. Safaeian M, Wright TC Jr, Stoler MH, et al. The IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage trial: human papillomavirus, cervical cytology, and histopathologic results from the baseline and 1‐year follow‐up phase. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225:278.e1‐278.e16. - PubMed
    1. Cuschieri K, Ronco G, Lorincz A, et al. Eurogin roadmap 2017: triage strategies for the management of HPV‐positive women in cervical screening programs. Int J Cancer. 2018;143:735‐745. - PubMed
    1. Wentzensen N, Schiffman M, Palmer T, Arbyn M. Triage of HPV positive women in cervical cancer screening. J Clin Virol. 2016;76(Suppl 1):S49‐S55. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances