Background: Intraoperative flash visual evoked potential (FVEP) can be used to monitor visual function during spine surgery. However, it is limited due to the previous perception of its sensitivity to inhalation anesthesia. We conducted this trial to test the noninferiority of sevoflurane-propofol-balanced anesthesia (BA) versus popular propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on the amplitude of FVEP during spine surgery.
Methods: A total of 60 patients undergoing spine surgery were randomized to receive either sevoflurane-propofol-balanced anesthesia (BA group) or propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA group) for anesthesia maintenance. We titrated the propofol plasma concentration to keep the bispectral index (BIS) values between 40 and 50. The primary outcome was the P100-N145 amplitudes of FVEP at 120 minutes after induction of anesthesia. The noninferiority margin (δ) was defined as 10% of the P100-N145 amplitude at 120 minutes after induction in the TIVA group. If the confidence interval (CI) for mean differences of P100-N145 amplitude at 120 minutes after induction between BA and TIVA groups lied above the lower limit of -δ with P < .025, we defined BA group was noninferior to TIVA group.
Results: Fifty-nine patients were included in the final analysis. The amplitude of P100-N145 at 120 minutes after anesthesia induction in group BA was noninferior to group TIVA (3.8 [1.3] µV vs 3.2 [1.6] µV, -δ = -0.32, mean difference, 0.57, 95% CI, -0.18 to 1.33, P for noninferiority = .015).
Conclusions: The effect of 0.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane-propofol-balanced anesthesia on the P100-N145 amplitude of FVEP was noninferior to that of propofol-based TIVA under comparable BIS range.
Copyright © 2021 International Anesthesia Research Society.