Effects of Spinal Anesthesia in Geriatric Hip Fracture: A Propensity-Matched Study
- PMID: 34561407
- DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002273
Effects of Spinal Anesthesia in Geriatric Hip Fracture: A Propensity-Matched Study
Abstract
Objectives: To identify whether anesthesia type is associated with surgical outcomes in geriatric patients undergoing operative treatment for a hip fracture.
Design: Retrospective database review of prospectively collected data.
Patients: Patients included in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. All included patients were 65-89 years of age and had a hip fracture treated with internal fixation, arthroplasty, or intramedullary device. Patients were excluded for open, pathologic, stress-related, or periprosthetic hip fractures.
Intervention: Use of spinal anesthesia (SA) or general anesthesia (GA).
Main outcome measurements: Complications, mortality, and discharge destination.
Results: A total of 23,649 cases met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were successfully matched using propensity score matching: 15,766 GA and 7883 SA. The odds of sustaining a complication were 21% lower in the SA group compared with those in the GA group (odds ratio SA/GA 0.791; 95% confidence interval, 0.747-0.838). The 30-day mortality rate was not correlated with SA or GA choice. Patients who underwent SA were significantly more likely to be discharged to home (odds ratio SA/GA 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.531-1.773).
Conclusions: No mortality difference exists between patients undergoing SA and those undergoing GA for hip fracture surgery. For patients undergoing hip fracture surgery with SA, there is lower 30-day complication profile and higher discharge to home rate compared with those undergoing GA. Both anesthesia modalities may be acceptable.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Association between anesthesia technique and death after hip fracture repair for patients with COVID-19.Can J Anaesth. 2024 Mar;71(3):367-377. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02673-2. Epub 2023 Dec 21. Can J Anaesth. 2024. PMID: 38129357 English.
-
Improved outcomes for spinal versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a retrospective cohort study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Jan 11;49(1):4-9. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-104217. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024. PMID: 37130697
-
Short-term complications in hip fracture surgery using spinal versus general anaesthesia.Injury. 2015 Apr;46(4):719-23. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Feb 11. Injury. 2015. PMID: 25704139
-
Clinical effectiveness and safety of spinal anaesthesia compared with general anaesthesia in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery using a consensus-based core outcome set and patient-and public-informed outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Br J Anaesth. 2022 Nov;129(5):788-800. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.07.031. Epub 2022 Sep 28. Br J Anaesth. 2022. PMID: 36270701 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparative outcomes of awake spine surgery under spinal versus general anesthesia: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Spine J. 2024 Mar;33(3):985-1000. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08071-y. Epub 2023 Dec 19. Eur Spine J. 2024. PMID: 38110776 Review.
Cited by
-
Factors associated with thirty-day mortality and intensive care unit admission in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024 Aug;30(8):571-578. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.24186. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024. PMID: 39092971 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing perioperative outcomes between regional anesthesia and general anesthesia in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Can J Anaesth. 2024 Jun;71(6):849-869. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02696-3. Epub 2024 Feb 28. Can J Anaesth. 2024. PMID: 38418761 Review. English.
-
Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy between Levobupivacaine 0.25% and Ropivacaine 0.375% for PENG (Pericapsular Nerve Group) Block in the Context of Hip Fracture Surgery of Elderly Patients: A Single-Center, Randomized, and Controlled Clinical Trial.J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 29;13(3):770. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030770. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38337464 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hu F, Jiang C, Shen J, et al. Preoperative predictors for mortality following hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury. 2012;43:676–685.
-
- Hamlet WP, Lieberman JR, Freedman EL, et al. Influence of health status and the timing of surgery on mortality in hip fracture patients. Am J Orthop Belle Mead NJ. 1997;26:621–627.
-
- Zuo D, Jin C, Shan M, et al. A comparison of general versus regional anesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:20295–20301.
-
- Neuman MD, Silber JH, Elkassabany NM, et al. Comparative effectiveness of regional versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery in adults. Anesthesiology. 2012;117:72–92.
-
- Warren J, Sundaram K, Anis H, et al. Spinal anesthesia is associated with decreased complications after total knee and hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28:e213–e221.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
