Convergent and divergent brain structural and functional abnormalities associated with developmental dyslexia

Elife. 2021 Sep 27:10:e69523. doi: 10.7554/eLife.69523.

Abstract

Brain abnormalities in the reading network have been repeatedly reported in individuals with developmental dyslexia (DD); however, it is still not totally understood where the structural and functional abnormalities are consistent/inconsistent across languages. In the current multimodal meta-analysis, we found convergent structural and functional alterations in the left superior temporal gyrus across languages, suggesting a neural signature of DD. We found greater reduction in grey matter volume and brain activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus in morpho-syllabic languages (e.g. Chinese) than in alphabetic languages, and greater reduction in brain activation in the left middle temporal gyrus and fusiform gyrus in alphabetic languages than in morpho-syllabic languages. These language differences are explained as consequences of being DD while learning a specific language. In addition, we also found brain regions that showed increased grey matter volume and brain activation, presumably suggesting compensations and brain regions that showed inconsistent alterations in brain structure and function. Our study provides important insights about the etiology of DD from a cross-linguistic perspective with considerations of consistency/inconsistency between structural and functional alterations.

Keywords: alphabetic language; dyslexia; human; morpho-syllabic language; multimodal meta-analysis; neuroscience.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Brain / diagnostic imaging
  • Brain / physiopathology*
  • Brain Mapping
  • Child
  • Dyslexia / diagnostic imaging
  • Dyslexia / physiopathology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Language
  • Learning
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Male
  • Young Adult

Associated data

  • Dryad/10.5061/dryad.0p2ngf222

Grants and funding

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.