Background: Several studies suggest an important influence of patient expectations on outcomes. We hypothesized that patient expectations with regard to length of postoperative stay influence convalescence after liver resections.
Method: This prospective, randomized study compared patients who were preoperatively either informed to be expected to stay 7-10 days (short arm) or 12-16 days (long arm) after major liver resections (≥4 segments). Additionally, psychological traits were assessed using questionnaires and the time to fulfillment of objective discharge criteria [oral analgesics only, first bowel movement, ability to tolerate solid food, full mobilization, no complications which need general anesthesia (>CD IIIa)] was defined as the primary endpoint.
Results: Patients in the short arm reached the objective discharge criteria after 8.39 days (SD 3.60), while patients in the long arm needed 12.73 days (SD 3.43) (p = 0.001). The actual length of stay in the short arm was 12.00 (IQR 8-16) and 19.3 days in the long arm (IQR 14-26) (p = 0.008). A more pronounced self-efficacy correlated with earlier fulfillment of the objective discharge criteria (p = 0.048), whereas patients placing a high value on their health needed more time (p = 0.049).
Conclusion: The expectation of a shorter length of stay results in a quicker objective, physical patient convalescence after major liver resections.
Keywords: Liver surgery; Patient outcomes; Placebo.
Copyright © 2021 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.