Prevalence of hearing protection device non-use among noise-exposed US workers in 2007 and 2014
- PMID: 34597431
- PMCID: PMC9020887
- DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23291
Prevalence of hearing protection device non-use among noise-exposed US workers in 2007 and 2014
Abstract
Background: This study estimated the prevalence of hearing protection device (HPD) non-use among US workers exposed to hazardous workplace noise and provided risk estimates.
Methods: Self-reported data from the National Health Interview Survey in 2007 (15,852 workers) and 2014 (23,656 workers) were examined. Weighted prevalence and adjusted prevalence ratios of HPD non-use (using HPDs half the time or less when exposed to hazardous noise) were estimated by demographic, industry, and occupation. Differences in the prevalences of non-use were estimated and compared.
Results: The prevalence of HPD non-use was 53% among all noise-exposed workers in 2014. Workers in the Accommodation and Food Services industry had the highest prevalence (90%) and risk (PR: 2.47, 95% confidence interval: 1.54-3.96) of HPD non-use. The industries with the lowest prevalences of noise exposure, including Finance and Insurance (2%) and Health Care and Social Assistance (4%), had some of the highest prevalences of HPD non-use (80% and 83%, respectively). There were no statistically significant changes in HPD non-use among industries between 2007 and 2014. Among occupations, HPD non-use increased 37% in Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports and Media, and decreased 39% in Architecture and Engineering.
Conclusion: The prevalence of HPD non-use remains high; especially within industries and occupations with fewer noise-exposed workers. These groups need targeted attention to increase awareness and compliance. Employers should require HPD use and trainings among noise-exposed workers and provide an assortment of HPDs tailored to noise level and type, workplace environment, communication and audibility needs, and individual comfort and convenience.
Keywords: hazardous noise; hearing protection; occupational noise exposure; prevalence; surveillance.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Towards a Holistic Model Explaining Hearing Protection Device Use among Workers.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 4;19(9):5578. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095578. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35564973 Free PMC article.
-
Exposure to hazardous workplace noise and use of hearing protection devices among US workers--NHANES, 1999-2004.Am J Ind Med. 2009 May;52(5):358-71. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20690. Am J Ind Med. 2009. PMID: 19267354
-
The influencing factors of hearing protection device usage among noise-exposed workers in Guangdong Province: a structural equation modeling-based survey.BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 15;24(1):1044. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18428-7. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38622576 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 07;7:CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub4. PMID: 23076923 Updated. Review.
-
Construction noise: exposure, effects, and the potential for remediation; a review and analysis.AIHA J (Fairfax, Va). 2002 Nov-Dec;63(6):768-89. doi: 10.1080/15428110208984768. AIHA J (Fairfax, Va). 2002. PMID: 12570087 Review.
Cited by
-
An Exploratory Study on Self-Reported Auditory Symptoms and Hearing Loss among Workers in a Small-Scale LPG Plant.Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2024 Apr-Jun;28(2):94-99. doi: 10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_44_23. Epub 2024 Jun 28. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2024. PMID: 39114100 Free PMC article.
-
Impacts of noise-induced hearing loss on sleep, health, and workplace: Multi-group analysis.Heliyon. 2024 May 8;10(9):e30861. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30861. eCollection 2024 May 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38774066 Free PMC article.
-
Hearing protection field attenuation estimation systems and associated training for reducing workers' exposure to noise.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 17;5(5):CD015066. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015066.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38757544 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Targeted therapeutic hypothermia protects against noise induced hearing loss.Front Neurosci. 2024 Jan 16;17:1296458. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1296458. eCollection 2023. Front Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38292902 Free PMC article.
-
Preventing Occupational Hearing Loss: 50 Years of Research and Recommendations from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.Semin Hear. 2023 Aug 3;44(4):351-393. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769499. eCollection 2023 Nov. Semin Hear. 2023. PMID: 37818146 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Themann C, Suter A, Stephenson M. National Research Agenda for the Prevention of Occupational Hearing Loss—Part 1. Semin Hear. 2013;34(03):145–207. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1349351 - DOI
-
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Noise and Hearing Loss Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/noise/reducenoiseexposure/noisecontrols.... Accessed August 5, 2020.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
