A Simple Algorithmic Approach Allows the Safe Use of Cephalosporin in "Penicillin-Allergic" Patients without the Need for Allergy Testing
- PMID: 34644269
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00027
A Simple Algorithmic Approach Allows the Safe Use of Cephalosporin in "Penicillin-Allergic" Patients without the Need for Allergy Testing
Abstract
Background: Patients who report a penicillin allergy are often given second-line antibiotic prophylaxis during total joint arthroplasty (TJA), with only a minority of patients undergoing additional consultations and allergy testing. In an effort to increase the use of cephalosporin prophylaxis in TJA, the present study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a simple, protocol-driven penicillin allergy screening program without the need for additional work-up.
Methods: Following implementation of a questionnaire-based screening protocol in May 2019, all patients scheduled for primary TJA were risk-stratified into low or high-risk categories. The low-risk cohort received cefazolin, and the high-risk cohort received non-cefazolin antibiotics. Patients were monitored prospectively, and data on antibiotic usage and adverse outcomes were documented. The protocol group (n = 2,078) was propensity score matched 1:1 with a control group that included patients who underwent TJA in the same institution prior to implementation of the protocol. The primary end point was the efficacy of the protocol in reducing unnecessary use of non-cephalosporin antibiotics for prophylaxis. Secondary outcomes included the rate of surgical site infections and allergic reactions to the administered antibiotic.
Results: A total of 357 patients (17.2%) reported a penicillin allergy in the protocol group compared with 310 patients (14.9%) with a recorded allergy in the control group (p = 0.052). The number of patients who received non-cephalosporin antibiotics was significantly lower in the protocol group (5.7% compared with 15.2% in the control group; p < 0.001), whereas there was no difference in the rate of total allergic reactions (0.8% compared with 0.7%, respectively; p = 0.857). Of the 239 low-risk patients (66.9%) in the protocol group, only 3 (1.3%) experienced a mild cutaneous reaction following cefazolin administration. There were no differences in the rates of superficial wound, deep periprosthetic, or Clostridioides difficile infections between the protocol and control groups.
Conclusions: A simple screening protocol allowed two-thirds of patients with a self-reported allergy to receive cefazolin without the need for additional consultations or testing. We believe this protocol can be safely implemented to increase the rate of cefazolin usage without a corresponding increase in the number of allergic reactions.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2021 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJS/G739).
Comment in
-
A Common Sense Approach to Concerns About Direct Allergy or Allergic Crossover with Penicillin: Commentary on an article by Graham S. Goh, MD, et al.: "A Simple Algorithmic Approach Allows the Safe Use of Cephalosporin in "Penicillin-Allergic" Patients without the Need for Allergy Testing".J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Dec 15;103(24):e99. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00876. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021. PMID: 34908563 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Antibiotic Stewardship Interventions Improve Choice of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty in Patients with Reported Penicillin Allergies.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jul 1;479(7):1484-1494. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001739. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021. PMID: 33856366 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Perioperative Cefazolin for Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients Who Have a Penicillin Allergy: Is It Safe?J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S2):S110-S116. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.058. Epub 2024 Apr 25. J Arthroplasty. 2024. PMID: 38677347
-
Is Vancomycin-only Prophylaxis for Patients With Penicillin Allergy Associated With Increased Risk of Infection After Arthroplasty?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1601-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4672-4. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016. PMID: 26689584 Free PMC article.
-
Are Cephalosporins Safe for Surgical Prophylaxis in Patients with Penicillin Allergy?Laryngoscope. 2024 Jun;134(6):2486-2488. doi: 10.1002/lary.31222. Epub 2023 Dec 10. Laryngoscope. 2024. PMID: 38073121 Review.
-
Misconceptions Surrounding Penicillin Allergy: Implications for Anesthesiologists.Anesth Analg. 2018 Sep;127(3):642-649. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003419. Anesth Analg. 2018. PMID: 29757781 Review.
References
-
- Garvin KL, Hanssen AD. Infection after total hip arthroplasty. Past, present, and future. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Oct;77(10):1576-88.
-
- Blumenthal KG, Ryan EE, Li Y, Lee H, Kuhlen JL, Shenoy ES. The Impact of a Reported Penicillin Allergy on Surgical Site Infection Risk. Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 18;66(3):329-36.
-
- Aboltins CA, Berdal JE, Casas F, Corona PS, Cuellar D, Ferrari MC, Hendershot E, Huang W, Kuo FC, Malkani A, Reyes F, Rudelli S, Safir O, Seyler T, Tan TL, Townsend R, Tuncay I, Turner D, Winkler H, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, Yates AJ, Zahar A. Hip and Knee Section, Prevention, Antimicrobials (Systemic): Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Feb;34(2S):S279-88.
-
- Sakoulas G, Geriak M, Nizet V. Is a Reported Penicillin Allergy Sufficient Grounds to Forgo the Multidimensional Antimicrobial Benefits of β-Lactam Antibiotics? Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 1;68(1):157-64.
-
- Lin RY. A perspective on penicillin allergy. Arch Intern Med. 1992 May;152(5):930-7.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
