Optimal bone biopsy route to the proximal femur evaluated by computed tomography-based finite element modeling

J Orthop Sci. 2022 Nov;27(6):1323-1327. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2021.08.007. Epub 2021 Oct 14.

Abstract

Introduction: The proximal femur (PF) is one of the most common locations of benign cystic lesions. A fracture after bone biopsy is a rare but severe complication. However, the risk of fracture after biopsy of this lesion has not been well-studied. Computed tomography (CT)-based finite element (FE) modeling estimates the elastic modulus and compressive strength enables fracture prediction. This study investigated strength of PF after biopsy by CT-FE modeling and determined the optimum biopsy level and size.

Materials and methods: Six male bone tumor patients' (15-38 years) total femur CT data (slice thickness, 0.8-1.0 mm) of the healthy side were obtained. Three different cylindrical bone defect (BD) diameters (10, 15, and 20 mm) were set on the lateral surface of PF at the following levels: level 1, insertion of the gluteus minimums; level 2, lower end of the greater trochanter (GT); level 3, origin of the vastus lateralis; level 4, center of the lesser trochanter (LT); and level 5, lower end of LT using Mechanical Finder software (version 8.0). Virtual loads were applied with incremental increases of 100 N until fracture occurred and the fracture load (FL) was evaluated.

Results: For BD with a diameter of 15 and 20 mm, there was a significant difference in the decrease of the mean FL, with an average of 22% at level 4 and 5, and 33%-44% at levels 3 to 5, respectively. At level 1 and 2, no significant decrease in the mean FL was observed regardless of the diameter of BD.

Conclusion: Biopsies at level 1 and 2 showed no significant decrease in bone strength. However, biopsy at level 1 may contaminate the GT bursas. Therefore, biopsy at level 2 (lower end of GT) can avoid contamination and minimize the effect on bone strength.

MeSH terms

  • Biopsy
  • Bone Density
  • Femur* / diagnostic imaging
  • Finite Element Analysis
  • Fractures, Bone*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods