Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct-Dec;15(4):431-434.
doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_158_21. Epub 2021 Sep 2.

Statistical significance or clinical significance? A researcher's dilemma for appropriate interpretation of research results

Affiliations
Review

Statistical significance or clinical significance? A researcher's dilemma for appropriate interpretation of research results

Hunny Sharma. Saudi J Anaesth. 2021 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

It is incredibly essential that the current clinicians and researchers remain updated with findings of current biomedical literature for evidence-based medicine. However, they come across many types of research that are nonreproducible and are even difficult to interpret clinically. Statistical and clinical significance is one such difficulty that clinicians and researchers face across many instances. In simpler terms, the P value tests all hypothesis about how the data were produced (model as whole), and not just the targeted hypothesis that it is intended to test (such as a null hypothesis) keeping in mind how reliable are the of the research results. Most of the times it is misinterpreted and misunderstood as a measure to judge the results as clinically significant. Hence this review aims to impart knowledge about "P" value and its importance in biostatistics, also highlights the importance of difference between statistical and clinical significance for appropriate interpretation of research results.

Keywords: Bias; biostatistics; clinical significance; research design; sample size; statistical significance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arnold LD, Braganza M, Salih R, Colditz GA. Statistical trends in the Journal of the American Medical Association and implications for training across the continuum of medical education. PLoS One. 2013;8:e77301. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grabowski B. “P<0.05” might not mean what you think: American statistical association clarifies P values. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108:djw194. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Page P. Beyond statistical significance: Clinical interpretation of rehabilitation research literature. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9:726–36. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhandari M, Joensson A. Part ΠC: Understanding Treatment Effects. Clinical Research for Surgeons. Thieme Electronic Book Library. 333, Seventh Avenue. New York, NY 10001, USA: Thieme Publisher; 2009. pp. 139–44.
    1. Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size-or why the P value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4:279–82. - PMC - PubMed