Evaluation of Potential Probiotic Properties of Lactobacillus and Bacillus Strains Derived from Various Sources for Their Potential Use in Swine Feeding

doi:10.1007/s12602-021-09861-w

. 2023 Jun;15(3):479-490.

doi: 10.1007/s12602-021-09861-w. Epub 2021 Oct 19.

Evaluation of Potential Probiotic Properties of Lactobacillus and Bacillus Strains Derived from Various Sources for Their Potential Use in Swine Feeding

Nuntiya Pahumunto^{1

2}, Gunnar Dahlen³, Rawee Teanpaisan^{4

5}

Affiliations

¹ Common Oral Diseases and Epidemiology Research Center, Hat Yai, Thailand.
² Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand.
³ Department of Oral Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
⁴ Common Oral Diseases and Epidemiology Research Center, Hat Yai, Thailand. rawee.t@psu.ac.th.
⁵ Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand. rawee.t@psu.ac.th.

PMID: 34665429
DOI: 10.1007/s12602-021-09861-w

Evaluation of Potential Probiotic Properties of Lactobacillus and Bacillus Strains Derived from Various Sources for Their Potential Use in Swine Feeding

Nuntiya Pahumunto et al. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2023 Jun.

. 2023 Jun;15(3):479-490.

doi: 10.1007/s12602-021-09861-w. Epub 2021 Oct 19.

Authors

Nuntiya Pahumunto^{1

2}, Gunnar Dahlen³, Rawee Teanpaisan^{4

5}

Affiliations

¹ Common Oral Diseases and Epidemiology Research Center, Hat Yai, Thailand.
² Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand.
³ Department of Oral Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
⁴ Common Oral Diseases and Epidemiology Research Center, Hat Yai, Thailand. rawee.t@psu.ac.th.
⁵ Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand. rawee.t@psu.ac.th.

PMID: 34665429
DOI: 10.1007/s12602-021-09861-w

Abstract

Beneficial effects of probiotics are relevant to the various potential properties of individual strains, and they may also relate to the original sources of the probiotic strains. This study aimed to characterize the potential probiotic properties of the strains originating from various sources for probiotics use in swine feeding. A total of 9 potential probiotic strains, seven lactobacilli and 2 bacilli, were examined for antimicrobial production against swine pathogens, adhesion and anti-adhesion of potential probiotic strains to IPEC-J2 cells, aggregation ability, host defense peptide expression, and hemolytic assay. The results highlight that all strains derived from different sources could exhibit probiotic properties, although different abilities were observed. L. rhamnosus SD11 exhibited the highest inhibitory effect against all pathogens compared to other strains. Bacillus licheniformis KMP-9, B. subtilis KMP-N004, and L. fermentum SD7 gave the highest internalization and that related to high abilities of exclusion, competition, and displacement inhibition to pathogens. Such strains also gave a higher co-aggregation to all pathogens compared to other potential probiotic strains. L. rhamnosus GG, L. fermentum SD7, L. rhamnosus SD4, and B. subtilis KMP-N004 had significantly higher pBD-2 mRNA expression than other strains. None of potential probiotic strains showed hemolytic activity. In conclusion, the strains derived from either humans or animals possessed desirable probiotic properties including inhibition against porcine pathogens, adhesion capacity to porcine enterocytes, anti-adhesion pathogens to porcine enterocytes, and modulated innate immunity. Results indicate that these probiotic strains may be good candidates for use in swine feeding to reduce the risk of infection.

Keywords: Adhesion; Aggregation; Anti-adhesion; Anti-microbial; IPEC-J2; Innate immune; Probiotics; Swine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Cited by

Characterization of the Effects of a Novel Probiotic on Salmonella Colonization of a Piglet-Derived Intestinal Microbiota Using Improved Bioreactor.
Grandmont A, Rhouma M, Létourneau-Montminy MP, Thériault W, Mainville I, Arcand Y, Leduc R, Demers B, Thibodeau A. Grandmont A, et al. Animals (Basel). 2024 Mar 2;14(5):787. doi: 10.3390/ani14050787. Animals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38473172 Free PMC article.
Bacillus subtilis Induces Human Beta Defensin-2 Through its Lipoproteins in Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells.
So YJ, Park OJ, Kwon Y, Im J, Lee D, Yun SH, Cho K, Yun CH, Han SH. So YJ, et al. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2024 Feb 20. doi: 10.1007/s12602-024-10224-4. Online ahead of print. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2024. PMID: 38376819
The Effect of Prebiotic Supplements on the Gastrointestinal Microbiota and Associated Health Parameters in Pigs.
Kiernan DP, O'Doherty JV, Sweeney T. Kiernan DP, et al. Animals (Basel). 2023 Sep 25;13(19):3012. doi: 10.3390/ani13193012. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37835619 Free PMC article. Review.
Effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus DSM7133 on Intestinal Porcine Epithelial Cells.
Palkovicsné Pézsa N, Kovács D, Somogyi F, Karancsi Z, Móritz AV, Jerzsele Á, Rácz B, Farkas O. Palkovicsné Pézsa N, et al. Animals (Basel). 2023 Sep 24;13(19):3007. doi: 10.3390/ani13193007. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37835613 Free PMC article.
The Effect of Maternal Probiotic or Synbiotic Supplementation on Sow and Offspring Gastrointestinal Microbiota, Health, and Performance.
Kiernan DP, O'Doherty JV, Sweeney T. Kiernan DP, et al. Animals (Basel). 2023 Sep 22;13(19):2996. doi: 10.3390/ani13192996. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37835602 Free PMC article. Review.

See all "Cited by" articles

References

1. Gaggia F, Mattarelli P, Biavati B (2010) Probiotics and prebiotics in animal feeding for safe food production. Int J Food Microbiol 141:S15–S28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.02.031 - DOI - PubMed
1. Yang J, Qian K, Wang C, Wu Y (2018) Roles of probiotic lactobacilli inclusion in helping piglets establish healthy intestinal inter-environment for pathogen defense. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 10:243–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-017-9273-y - DOI - PubMed
1. Liao SF, Nyachoti M (2017) Using probiotics to improve swine gut health and nutrient utilization. Anim Nutr 3:331–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2017.06.007 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
1. Markowiak P, Śliżewska K (2017) Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health. Nutrients 9:1–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9091021 - DOI
1. Kritas SK, Morrison RB (2005) Evaluation of probiotics as a substitute for antibiotics in a large pig nursery. Vet Rec 156:447–448. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.156.14.447 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Springer

[1] Gaggia F, Mattarelli P, Biavati B (2010) Probiotics and prebiotics in animal feeding for safe food production. Int J Food Microbiol 141:S15–S28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.02.031 - DOI - PubMed

[2] Gaggia F, Mattarelli P, Biavati B (2010) Probiotics and prebiotics in animal feeding for safe food production. Int J Food Microbiol 141:S15–S28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.02.031 - DOI - PubMed

[3] Yang J, Qian K, Wang C, Wu Y (2018) Roles of probiotic lactobacilli inclusion in helping piglets establish healthy intestinal inter-environment for pathogen defense. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 10:243–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-017-9273-y - DOI - PubMed

[4] Yang J, Qian K, Wang C, Wu Y (2018) Roles of probiotic lactobacilli inclusion in helping piglets establish healthy intestinal inter-environment for pathogen defense. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 10:243–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-017-9273-y - DOI - PubMed

[5] Liao SF, Nyachoti M (2017) Using probiotics to improve swine gut health and nutrient utilization. Anim Nutr 3:331–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2017.06.007 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

[6] Liao SF, Nyachoti M (2017) Using probiotics to improve swine gut health and nutrient utilization. Anim Nutr 3:331–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2017.06.007 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

[7] Markowiak P, Śliżewska K (2017) Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health. Nutrients 9:1–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9091021 - DOI

[8] Markowiak P, Śliżewska K (2017) Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health. Nutrients 9:1–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9091021 - DOI

[9] Kritas SK, Morrison RB (2005) Evaluation of probiotics as a substitute for antibiotics in a large pig nursery. Vet Rec 156:447–448. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.156.14.447 - DOI - PubMed

[10] Kritas SK, Morrison RB (2005) Evaluation of probiotics as a substitute for antibiotics in a large pig nursery. Vet Rec 156:447–448. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.156.14.447 - DOI - PubMed

Save citation to file

Email citation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

Evaluation of Potential Probiotic Properties of Lactobacillus and Bacillus Strains Derived from Various Sources for Their Potential Use in Swine Feeding

Affiliations

Evaluation of Potential Probiotic Properties of Lactobacillus and Bacillus Strains Derived from Various Sources for Their Potential Use in Swine Feeding

Authors

Affiliations

Abstract

Similar articles

Cited by

References

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Abstract

Similar articles

Cited by

References

Publication types

MeSH terms

Related information

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources