Comparison of the transcriptomic responses of two Chrysanthemum morifolium cultivars to low light
- PMID: 34689280
- DOI: 10.1007/s11033-021-06729-8
Comparison of the transcriptomic responses of two Chrysanthemum morifolium cultivars to low light
Abstract
Background: Low light is a primary regulator of chrysanthemum growth. Our aim was to analyse the different transcriptomic responses of two Chrysanthemum morifolium cultivars to low light.
Methods and results: We conducted a transcriptomic analysis of leaf samples from the 'Nannonggongfen' and 'Nannongxuefeng' chrysanthemum cultivars following a 5-day exposure to optimal light (70%, control [CK]) or low-light (20%, LL) conditions. Gene Ontology (GO) classification of upregulated genes revealed these genes to be associated with 11 cellular components, 9 molecular functions, and 15 biological processes, with the majority being localized to the chloroplast, highlighting the role of chloroplast proteins as regulators of shading tolerance. Downregulated genes were associated with 11 cellular components, 8 molecular functions, and 16 biological processes. Heat map analyses suggested that basic helix-loop-helix domain genes and elongation factors were markedly downregulated in 'Nannongxuefeng' leaves, consistent with the maintenance of normal stem length, whereas no comparable changes were observed in 'Nanonggongfen' leaves. Subsequent qPCR analyses revealed that phytochrome-interacting factors and dormancy-associated genes were significantly upregulated under LL conditions relative to CK conditions, while succinate dehydrogenase 1, elongated hypocotyls 5, and auxin-responsive gene of were significantly downregulated under LL conditions.
Conclusions: These findings suggest that LL plants were significantly lower than those of the CK plants. Low-light tolerant chrysanthemum cultivars may maintain reduced indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and elongation factor expression as a means of preventing the onset of shade-avoidance symptoms.
Keywords: Gene ontology; Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes; Low-light resistance; Photosynthesis; Transcriptome profiling.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
Similar articles
-
Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Waterlogging-Sensitive and Waterlogging-Tolerant Chrysanthemum morifolium Cultivars under Waterlogging Stress and Reoxygenation Conditions.Int J Mol Sci. 2018 May 14;19(5):1455. doi: 10.3390/ijms19051455. Int J Mol Sci. 2018. PMID: 29757964 Free PMC article.
-
Transcriptomic and hormone analyses reveal mechanisms underlying petal elongation in Chrysanthemum morifolium 'Jinba'.Plant Mol Biol. 2017 Apr;93(6):593-606. doi: 10.1007/s11103-017-0584-x. Epub 2017 Jan 20. Plant Mol Biol. 2017. PMID: 28108965
-
Whole-transcriptome analysis of differentially expressed genes in the ray florets and disc florets of Chrysanthemum morifolium.BMC Genomics. 2016 May 25;17:398. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2733-z. BMC Genomics. 2016. PMID: 27225275 Free PMC article.
-
iTRAQ-Based Protein Profiling Provides Insights into the Mechanism of Light-Induced Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum × morifolium).Genes (Basel). 2019 Dec 9;10(12):1024. doi: 10.3390/genes10121024. Genes (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31835383 Free PMC article.
-
Sugar Transporter, CmSWEET17, Promotes Bud Outgrowth in Chrysanthemum Morifolium.Genes (Basel). 2019 Dec 24;11(1):26. doi: 10.3390/genes11010026. Genes (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31878242 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Physiological, Photosynthetic, and Transcriptomics Insights into the Influence of Shading on Leafy Sweet Potato.Genes (Basel). 2023 Nov 22;14(12):2112. doi: 10.3390/genes14122112. Genes (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38136933 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Deng YM, Li CC, Shao QS et al (2012) Differential responses of double petal and multi petal jasmine to shading: I. Photosynthetic characteristics and chloroplast ultrastructure. Plant Physiol Biochem 55:93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.03.006 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Zheng L, Labeke MCV (2017) Chrysanthemum morphology, photosynthetic efficiency and antioxidant capacity are differentially modified by light quality. J Plant Physiol 213:66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2017.03.005 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Parlitz S, Kunze R, Mueller RB, Balazadeh S (2011) Regulation of photosynthesis and transcription factor expression by leaf shading and re-illumination in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. J Plant Physiol 168:1311–1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2011.02.001 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dutta S, Cruz JA, Imran SM, Chen J, Kramer DM, Osteryoung KW (2017) Variations in chloroplast movement and chlorophyll fluorescence among chloroplast division mutants under light stress. J Exp Bot 68:3541–3555. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx203 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Li Y, Xin G, Wei M, Shi Q, Yang F, Wang X (2017) Carbohydrate accumulation and sucrose metabolism responses in tomato seedling leaves when subjected to different light qualities. Sci Hortic 225:490–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.07.053 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
