Five-year review of intraoperative pathology consultation in a single institution

Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2021 Jul 9;34(6):649-653. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2021.1941700. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Intraoperative pathology consultation plays an important role in the management of surgical patients and is also a measure for quality control in surgical pathology. A retrospective study was conducted to review intraoperative consultation during a 5-year period at a single institution. There were 19,145 intraoperative pathology consultation cases, including 19,026 concordant cases, 71 (<1%) frozen discordant cases, 11 (<1%) gross discordant cases, and 37 (<1%) deferred cases. Among frozen discordant cases, the most common cause for discordance was histologic sampling error (52.1%), followed by misinterpretation (42.3%). The most common major (clinically significant) frozen discordance was histologic sampling error for skin margins (32.4%), followed by histologic sampling error for lymph node metastasis (13.5%). Although our discordant rate (0.43%) was lower than that in previously reported studies (2%-8%), our major discordant rate was relatively high (50%). This review suggests that deeper sectioning of the blocks could improve the quality of our intraoperative consultations.

Keywords: Errors; false-negative; false-positive; frozen section; intraoperative consultation; misinterpretation; quality improvement; sampling.