Maternal morbidity after preterm premature rupture of membranes at <24 weeks' gestation
- PMID: 34736914
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.10.036
Maternal morbidity after preterm premature rupture of membranes at <24 weeks' gestation
Abstract
Background: After preterm premature rupture of membranes at <24 weeks' gestation, pregnant women may choose continuation (expectant management) or termination of pregnancy, via either dilation and evacuation or labor induction. Neonatal outcomes after expectant management are well described. In contrast, limited research addresses maternal outcomes associated with expectant management compared to termination of pregnancy.
Objective: This study aimed to compare maternal morbidity after preterm premature rupture of membranes at <24 weeks' gestation in women who choose either expectant management or termination of pregnancy.
Study design: This retrospective cohort study included women with preterm premature rupture of membranes between 14 0/7 and 23 6/7 weeks' gestation with singleton or twin pregnancies at 3 institutions from 2011 to 2018. We excluded pregnancies complicated by fetal anomalies, rupture of membranes immediately after obstetrical procedures (chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis, cerclage placement, fetal reduction), spontaneous delivery <24 hours after membrane rupture, and contraindications to expectant management. Our primary outcome was the difference in composite maternal morbidity between women choosing expectant management and women choosing termination of pregnancy. We defined composite maternal morbidity as at least 1 of the following: chorioamnionitis, endometritis, sepsis, unplanned operative procedure after delivery (dilation and curettage, laparoscopy, or laparotomy), injury requiring repair, unplanned hysterectomy, unplanned hysterotomy (excluding cesarean delivery), uterine rupture, hemorrhage of >1000 mL, transfusion, admission to the maternal intensive care unit, acute renal insufficiency, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, and readmission to the hospital within 6 weeks. We compared the demographic and antenatal characteristics of women choosing expectant management with that of women choosing termination of pregnancy and used logistic regression to quantify the association between initial management decision and composite maternal morbidity.
Results: We identified 350 women with pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes at <24 weeks' gestation, and 208 women were eligible for the study. Of the 208 women, 108 (51.9%) chose expectant management as initial management, and 100 (48.1%) chose termination of pregnancy as initial management. Among women selecting termination of pregnancy, 67.0% underwent labor induction, and 33.0% underwent dilation and evacuation. Compared to women who chose termination of pregnancy, women who chose expectant management had 4.1 times the odds of developing chorioamnionitis (38.0% vs 13.0%; 95% confidence interval, 2.03-8.26) and 2.44 times the odds of postpartum hemorrhage (23.1% vs 11.0%; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-5.26). Admissions to the intensive care unit and unplanned hysterectomy only occurred after expectant management (2.8% vs 0.0% and 0.9% vs 0.0%). Of women who chose expectant management, 36.2% delivered via cesarean delivery with 56.4% non-low transverse uterine incisions. Composite maternal morbidity rates were 60.2% in the expectant management group and 33.0% in the termination of pregnancy group. After adjusting for gestational age at rupture, site, race and ethnicity, gestational age at entry to prenatal care, preterm premature rupture of membranes in a previous pregnancy, twin pregnancy, smoking, cerclage, and cervical examination at the time of presentation, expectant management was associated with 3.47 times the odds of composite maternal morbidity (95% confidence interval, 1.52-7.93), corresponding to an adjusted relative risk of 1.91 (95% confidence interval, 1.35-2.73). Among women who chose expectant management, 15.7% avoided morbidity and had a neonate who survived to discharge.
Conclusion: Expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at <24 weeks' gestation was associated with a significantly increased risk of maternal morbidity when compared to termination of pregnancy.
Keywords: PPROM; maternal morbidity; periviability; previability; second trimester of pregnancy complication; termination of pregnancy.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks' gestation for improving pregnancy outcome.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 3;3(3):CD004735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004735.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28257562 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Individualized treatment of preterm premature rupture of membranes to prolong the latency period, reduce the rate of preterm birth, and improve neonatal outcomes.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):296.e1-296.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.02.037. Epub 2022 Mar 5. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35257664
-
Maternal Morbidity After Previable Prelabor Rupture of Membranes.Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;129(1):101-106. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001803. Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 27926655
-
Intentional early delivery versus expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28-32 weeks' gestation: A multicentre randomized controlled trial (MICADO STUDY).Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Feb;233:30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.11.024. Epub 2018 Dec 5. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019. PMID: 30553135 Clinical Trial.
-
Outcome of prelabor rupture of membranes before or at the limit of viability: systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Jun;6(6):101370. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101370. Epub 2024 Apr 20. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024. PMID: 38648897 Review.
Cited by
-
Personhood Begins at Birth: The Rational Foundation for Abortion Policy in a Secular State.J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10352-0. Online ahead of print. J Bioeth Inq. 2024. PMID: 39172346
-
Preterm prelabour rupture of membranes before 23 weeks' gestation: prospective observational study.BMJ Med. 2024 Mar 19;3(1):e000729. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000729. eCollection 2024. BMJ Med. 2024. PMID: 38601318 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal Outcomes Following Active vs. Expectant Management of Previable Preterm Pre-Labor Rupture of Membranes: A Meta-Analysis.Children (Basel). 2023 Aug 4;10(8):1347. doi: 10.3390/children10081347. Children (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37628346 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Is Spontaneous Preterm Prelabor of Membrane Rupture Irreversible? A Review of Potentially Curative Approaches.Biomedicines. 2023 Jul 4;11(7):1900. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11071900. Biomedicines. 2023. PMID: 37509539 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Projected Health Outcomes Associated With 3 US Supreme Court Decisions in 2022 on COVID-19 Workplace Protections, Handgun-Carry Restrictions, and Abortion Rights.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2315578. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.15578. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37289459 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
