Effect of Epidural Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Local Anesthetics for Labor Analgesia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021 Oct 27:2021:4886970. doi: 10.1155/2021/4886970. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Background: This study aims to determine the analgesic effect and safety of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to epidural local anesthetics during labor.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials comparing epidural blocks with or without dexmedetomidine for labor analgesia were comprehensively searched. Review manager 5.4 was used to analyze the extracted data.

Results: Compared with placebo and opioids, dexmedetomidine relieved labor pain of 15 min (P=0.002), 30 min (P=0.01), and 120 min (P=0.02) after block and at the moment of fetal disengagement (P=0.0002), decreased mean arterial pressure of 120 min (P=0.01), heart rate of 30 min (P=0.003), 60 min (P < 0.00001), and 120 min (P < 0.00001) after block, blood loss (P=0.02), and the incidence of nausea/vomiting (P=0.006), and increased the incidence of maternal bradycardia (P=0.04). However, sensitivity analysis only found that the incidence of nausea/vomiting was significantly different. Compared with placebo, dexmedetomidine relieved labor pain of 30 min after block (P < 0.00001) and did not increase the incidences of side effects, but only two studies were enrolled. Compared with opioids, dexmedetomidine decreased the incidence of nausea/vomiting (P=0.002), increased the incidence of maternal bradycardia (P=0.04), and had a similar effect on labor pain relief; however, sensitivity analysis found that significant difference existed only at the incidence of nausea/vomiting. Other outcomes from meta-analysis or subgroup analysis were not different.

Conclusions: Epidural dexmedetomidine has the potential to offer a better analgesic effect than placebo, similar labor pain control to opioids, and has no definite adverse effects on the parturient or fetus, but more high-quality studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.

Publication types

  • Review