Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct 28:12:679916.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.679916. eCollection 2021.

Phosphate-Dependent Regulation of Growth and Stresses Management in Plants

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Phosphate-Dependent Regulation of Growth and Stresses Management in Plants

Noura Bechtaoui et al. Front Plant Sci. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

The importance of phosphorus in the regulation of plant growth function is well studied. However, the role of the inorganic phosphate (Pi) molecule in the mitigation of abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, heavy metal, heat, and acid stresses are poorly understood. We revisited peer-reviewed articles on plant growth characteristics that are phosphorus (P)-dependently regulated under the sufficient-P and low/no-P starvation alone or either combined with one of the mentioned stress. We found that the photosynthesis rate and stomatal conductance decreased under Pi-starved conditions. The total chlorophyll contents were increased in the P-deficient plants, owing to the lack of Pi molecules to sustain the photosynthesis functioning, particularly, the Rubisco and fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase function. The dry biomass of shoots, roots, and P concentrations were significantly reduced under Pi starvation with marketable effects in the cereal than in the legumes. To mitigate P stress, plants activate alternative regulatory pathways, the Pi-dependent glycolysis, and mitochondrial respiration in the cytoplasm. Plants grown under well-Pi supplementation of drought stress exhibited higher dry biomass of shoots than the no-P treated ones. The Pi supply to plants grown under heavy metals stress reduced the metal concentrations in the leaves for the cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb), but could not prevent them from absorbing heavy metals from soils. To detoxify from heavy metal stress, plants enhance the catalase and ascorbate peroxidase activity that prevents lipid peroxidation in the leaves. The HvPIP and PHO1 genes were over-expressed under both Pi starvation alone and Pi plus drought, or Pi plus salinity stress combination, implying their key roles to mediate the stress mitigations. Agronomy Pi-based interventions to increase Pi at the on-farm levels were discussed. Revisiting the roles of P in growth and its better management in agricultural lands or where P is supplemented as fertilizer could help the plants to survive under abiotic stresses.

Keywords: adaptation; phosphate; phosphorus; plant growth; stress tolerance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Boxplots and scatter data of the photosynthesis rate (A) total chlorophyll content (B) stomatal conductance (C) leaf area (D) under sufficient-P (+P), and deficient (–P) conditions of soybean, cowpea, wheat, and maize plants. 1 Average change (%) of +P applied over P-deficient plants. Means + bootstrap at 95% CIs of two tested P treatments that do not overlap indicate a significant relative increase difference.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cellular Pi-dependent regulation of the plant photosynthesis activity displaying the major process. PGA, 3-phosphoglycerate; diPGA, 1,3-diphosphoglycerate; FBP, Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate; F2,6, Fructose-2,6-bisphosphate; F6P, Fructose 6-phosphate; Ru5P, Ribulose-5-phosphate; RuBP, Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate; SBP, Sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphate; S7P, Sedoheptulose-7-phosphate; G6P, Glucose 6-phosphate; G1P, Glucose 1-phosphate; Triose-P, Triose phosphate; ADPG, ADP-glucose UDPG, UDP-glucose; PMP, Pentose monophosphate; 6PG, 6- phosphogluconate; ATP, Adenosine triphosphate; ADP, Adenosine di-phosphate; NADP, Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; UTP, Uridine-5′-triphosphate; PP, pyrophosphate. The image illustration was redesigned by NB and MJ.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Boxplots and scatter data of shoot dry weight (A) shoot-P (B) root-P (C) concentrations, and P uptake (D) under +P and −P conditions of soybean, cowpea, wheat, and maize plants. 1Average change (%) of the sufficient-P applied over P-deficient plants. Means + bootstrap at 95 % CIs of two tested P treatments that do not overlap indicate a significant relative increase difference.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Boxplots and scatter data of shoot (A) root (B) dry weights, shoot-P (C) and root-P (D) internal concentrations under +P and −P under drought or water deficit conditions of soybean, cowpea, wheat, and maize plants. 1Average change (%) of the +P applied over P-deficient plants. Means + bootstrap at 95% CIs of two tested P treatments that do not overlap indicate a significant relative increase difference.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Pi-dependent regulation of the plant growth process at the cellular levels. UDP-glucose, Uridine diphosphate glucose; PEPC, Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase; Hexose-P, Hexose phosphate; OAA, Oxaloacetate; ASP, aspartate; PEP, Phosphoenolpyruvate; SUS, Sucrose synthase; PKc, Cytosolic pyruvate kinase; MDHc, Cytosolic malate dehydrogenase; MDHm, Mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase; MEm, Mitochondrial malic enzyme; PDCm, mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex; CS, Citrate synthase. The image illustration was redesigned by NB and MJ.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Boxplots and scatter data of shoot Pb (A) Cd (B) and Zn (C) contents under +P and –P conditions of wheat, sedum, rice, barley, maize, and rapeseed plants. 1Average change (%) of the +P applied over P-deficient plants. Means + bootstrap at 95% CIs of two tested P treatments that do not overlap zero indicate a significant relative increase difference.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ainsworth E. A., Long S. P. (2021). 30 years of free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE): what have we learned about future crop productivity and its potential for adaptation? Glob. Change Biol. 27, 27–49. 10.1111/gcb.15375 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alori E. T., Glick B. R., Babalola O. O. (2017). Microbial phosphorus solubilization and its potential for use in sustainable agriculture. Front. Microbiol. 8:971. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00971 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armand T., Cullen M., Boiziot F., Li L., Fricke W. (2019). Cortex cell hydraulic conductivity, endodermal apoplastic barriers and root hydraulics change in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in response to a low supply of N and P. Ann. Bot. 113:12. 10.1093/aob/mcz113 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arshad M., Ali S., Noman A., Ali Q., Rizwan M., Farid M., et al. . (2016). Phosphorus amendment decreased cadmium (Cd) uptake and ameliorates chlorophyll contents, gas exchange attributes, antioxidants, and mineral nutrients in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Cd stress. Archiv. Agron. Soil Sci. 62, 533–546. 10.1080/03650340.2015.1064903 - DOI
    1. Asfaw E., Suryabhagavan K. V., Argaw M. (2018). Soil salinity modeling and mapping using remote sensing and GIS: the case of Wonji sugar cane irrigation farm, Ethiopia. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 17, 250–258. 10.1016/j.jssas.2016.05.003 - DOI