Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conservative Treatment in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: The AVATAR Trial
- PMID: 34779220
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057639
Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conservative Treatment in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: The AVATAR Trial
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conservative Treatment in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: The AVATAR Trial.Circulation. 2022 Mar;145(9):e761. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001057. Epub 2022 Feb 28. Circulation. 2022. PMID: 35226561 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) represents a class I indication in symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). However, indications for early SAVR in asymptomatic patients with severe AS and normal left ventricular function remain debated.
Methods: The AVATAR trial (Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conservative Treatment in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis) is an investigator-initiated international prospective randomized controlled trial that evaluated the safety and efficacy of early SAVR in the treatment of asymptomatic patients with severe AS, according to common criteria (valve area ≤1 cm2 with aortic jet velocity >4 m/s or a mean transaortic gradient ≥40 mm Hg), and with normal left ventricular function. Negative exercise testing was mandatory for inclusion. The primary hypothesis was that early SAVR would reduce the primary composite end point of all-cause death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned hospitalization for heart failure compared with a conservative strategy according to guidelines. The trial was designed as event-driven to reach a minimum of 35 prespecified events. The study was performed in 9 centers in 7 European countries.
Results: Between June 2015 and September 2020, 157 patients (mean age, 67 years; 57% men) were randomly allocated to early surgery (n=78) or conservative treatment (n=79). Follow-up was completed in May 2021. Overall median follow-up was 32 months: 28 months in the early surgery group and 35 months in the conservative treatment group. There was a total of 39 events, 13 in early surgery and 26 in the conservative treatment group. In the early surgery group, 72 patients (92.3%) underwent SAVR with operative mortality of 1.4%. In an intention-to-treat analysis, patients randomized to early surgery had a significantly lower incidence of primary composite end point than those in the conservative arm (hazard ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.23-0.90]; P=0.02). There was no statistical difference in secondary end points, including all-cause mortality, first heart failure hospitalizations, major bleeding, or thromboembolic complications, but trends were consistent with the primary outcome.
Conclusions: In asymptomatic patients with severe AS, early surgery reduced a primary composite of all-cause death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned hospitalization for heart failure compared with conservative treatment. This randomized trial provides preliminary support for early SAVR once AS becomes severe, regardless of symptoms. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02436655.
Keywords: aortic stenosis; asymptomatic; intervention; randomized controlled trial.
Comment in
-
Benefit of early aortic valve surgery in asymptomatic, severe AS.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022 Feb;19(2):78. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00656-8. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 34819650 No abstract available.
-
Letter by Dweck and Dahl Regarding Article, "Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conservative Treatment in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: The AVATAR Trial".Circulation. 2022 Aug 9;146(6):e46-e47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058646. Epub 2022 Aug 8. Circulation. 2022. PMID: 35939541 No abstract available.
-
Letter by Ennezat et al Regarding Article, "Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conservative Treatment in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: The AVATAR Trial".Circulation. 2022 Aug 9;146(6):e44-e45. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058505. Epub 2022 Aug 8. Circulation. 2022. PMID: 35939542 No abstract available.
-
Response by Banovic et al to Letter Regarding Article, "Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conservative Treatment in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: The AVATAR Trial".Circulation. 2022 Aug 9;146(6):e48-e49. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.060918. Epub 2022 Aug 8. Circulation. 2022. PMID: 35939543 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Aortic valve replacement vs. conservative treatment in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: long-term follow-up of the AVATAR trial.Eur Heart J. 2024 Nov 8;45(42):4526-4535. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae585. Eur Heart J. 2024. PMID: 39217448 Clinical Trial.
-
Early Surgery or Conservative Care for Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 9;382(2):111-119. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1912846. Epub 2019 Nov 16. N Engl J Med. 2020. PMID: 31733181 Clinical Trial.
-
Echocardiographic Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: The PARTNER 3 Trial.Circulation. 2020 May 12;141(19):1527-1537. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044574. Epub 2020 Apr 10. Circulation. 2020. PMID: 32272848 Clinical Trial.
-
Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement for Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Single Technology Assessment of Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve [Internet].Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Aug 25. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-01. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Aug 25. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-01. PMID: 29553663 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
A meta-analysis of mortality and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events following transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis.Am J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 15;112(6):850-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 4. Am J Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23756547 Review.
Cited by
-
Transcatheter Procedure Versus Surgical Interventions for Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Contemporary Evaluation Against Conservative Management.Cureus. 2024 Oct 19;16(10):e71859. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71859. eCollection 2024 Oct. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39559653 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Latest Advances and Prospects.J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 1;13(21):6583. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216583. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39518721 Free PMC article.
-
Early Intervention in Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis and Myocardial Fibrosis: The EVOLVED Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2024 Oct 28:e2422730. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.22730. Online ahead of print. JAMA. 2024. PMID: 39466640
-
Toward a Holistic Approach in Aortic Stenosis Using Machine-Learning Algorithms.JACC Adv. 2024 Aug 14;3(9):101134. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101134. eCollection 2024 Sep. JACC Adv. 2024. PMID: 39372485 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence and Prognostic Significance of Silent Coronary Disease in Asymptomatic Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis.Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Sep 14;60(9):1503. doi: 10.3390/medicina60091503. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 39336544 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
